Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Covalent Bonds01:29

Covalent Bonds

163.2K
Overview
163.2K
Covalent Bonds01:08

Covalent Bonds

11.4K
Overview
When two atoms share electrons to complete their valence shells, they create a covalent bond. An atom's electronegativity—the force with which shared electrons are pulled towards an atom—determines how the electrons are shared. Molecules formed with covalent bonds can be either polar or nonpolar. Atoms with similar electronegativities form nonpolar covalent bonds; the electrons are shared equally. Atoms with different electronegativities share electrons unequally,...
11.4K
Network Covalent Solids02:18

Network Covalent Solids

16.2K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
16.2K
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators02:04

Covalently Linked Protein Regulators

9.7K
Proteins can undergo many types of post-translational modifications, often in response to changes in their environment. These modifications play an important role in the function and stability of these proteins. Covalently linked molecules include functional groups, such as methyl, acetyl, and phosphate groups, and also small proteins, such as ubiquitin. There are around 200 different types of covalent regulators that have been identified.
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein....
9.7K
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators02:04

Covalently Linked Protein Regulators

2.0K
2.0K
Covalent Bonding and Lewis Structures02:46

Covalent Bonding and Lewis Structures

61.7K
Compared to ionic bonds, which results from the transfer of electrons between metallic and nonmetallic atoms, covalent bonds result from the mutual attraction of atoms for a “shared” pair of electrons.
61.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Probing 3-Amino-2H-Azaindazoles as Allosteric Inhibitors of the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP2.

ChemMedChem·2026
Same author

Mapping Functionally Relevant Tractable Lysines of Challenging Protein Targets by Covalent Fragment Screening.

Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology·2026
Same author

Fragment-Based Design of Targeted Covalent Inhibitors: The Scope and Limitation of Linking Approaches.

ChemMedChem·2026
Same author

α-Halothioamide warheads with enhanced cysteine reactivity and specificity for covalent protein labelling.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Mapping the SHP2 Allosteric Pocket With Target-Biased Covalent Fragments.

Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology·2026
Same author

Benchmarking p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> Prediction Algorithms against an Extensive, Public Data Set.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

QSAR in the Browser: An Interactive Cheminformatics Web Application.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

FoldDoF: Utilizing the Primary Degrees of Freedom of Protein Backbone for Geometric Modeling and Generation.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Derisking Affinity Optimization for Macrocycles and Cyclic Peptides: High-Precision Free Energy Simulations across Five Diverse Targets.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

An End-User Audit of Reproducibility, Data Leakage, and Overfitting of the Top-Ranked ADMET Prediction Models in TDC Leaderboards.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

PFASGroups: An Open-Source Framework for Automated Identification, Structural Classification, and Prioritization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

DeepKbhb: Context-Aware Prediction of Human Lysine β-Hydroxybutyrylation Sites.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Screening Traditional Chinese Medicine Compounds for Inhibiting UCHL3 Activity Based on Molecular Docking and Deubiquitinating Enzyme Probe Technology
10:25

Screening Traditional Chinese Medicine Compounds for Inhibiting UCHL3 Activity Based on Molecular Docking and Deubiquitinating Enzyme Probe Technology

Published on: November 22, 2024

698

Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.

Andrea Scarpino1, György G Ferenczy1, György M Keserű1

  • 1Medicinal Chemistry Research Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences , Hungarian Academy of Sciences , Magyar tudósok körútja 2 , Budapest 1117 , Hungary.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|June 12, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates six covalent docking tools for predicting drug binding modes. Performance is comparable to noncovalent methods, with success depending on warhead chemistry, ligand features, and target accessibility.

More Related Videos

Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Candidates against Coxsackievirus A16
06:03

Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Candidates against Coxsackievirus A16

Published on: July 15, 2019

8.4K
Microfluidic-based Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks COFs: A Tool for Continuous Production of COF Fibers and Direct Printing on a Surface
08:42

Microfluidic-based Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks COFs: A Tool for Continuous Production of COF Fibers and Direct Printing on a Surface

Published on: July 10, 2017

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Screening Traditional Chinese Medicine Compounds for Inhibiting UCHL3 Activity Based on Molecular Docking and Deubiquitinating Enzyme Probe Technology
10:25

Screening Traditional Chinese Medicine Compounds for Inhibiting UCHL3 Activity Based on Molecular Docking and Deubiquitinating Enzyme Probe Technology

Published on: November 22, 2024

698
Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Candidates against Coxsackievirus A16
06:03

Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Candidates against Coxsackievirus A16

Published on: July 15, 2019

8.4K
Microfluidic-based Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks COFs: A Tool for Continuous Production of COF Fibers and Direct Printing on a Surface
08:42

Microfluidic-based Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks COFs: A Tool for Continuous Production of COF Fibers and Direct Printing on a Surface

Published on: July 10, 2017

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Structural biology

Background:

  • Covalent inhibitors are increasingly important in drug discovery.
  • Accurate prediction of binding modes is crucial for designing effective covalent drugs.
  • Existing covalent docking tools require rigorous performance evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of six covalent docking tools (AutoDock4, CovDock, FITTED, GOLD, ICM-Pro, MOE).
  • To assess their ability to reproduce experimental binding modes for covalent inhibitors.
  • To identify factors influencing docking accuracy and provide guidelines for tool selection.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of six covalent docking programs against a large, diverse set of covalent complexes.
  • Analysis of ligand pose accuracy using Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) from experimental structures.
  • Investigation of the impact of ligand properties (size, flexibility, warhead chemistry) and protein features (cysteine accessibility) on docking performance.

Main Results:

  • 40-60% of top poses were within 2.0 Å RMSD, improving to 50-90% with the best of top ten poses.
  • Performance is comparable to noncovalent docking tools.
  • Success rates varied by warhead chemistry (Michael additions, nucleophilic additions, substitutions performed better).
  • Larger, more flexible ligands and certain reaction types (ring opening, disulfide formation) reduced accuracy.
  • Increased target cysteine accessibility improved predictions.
  • Performance was protein-dependent, suggesting a need for target-specific tool selection.
  • Noncovalent docking into mutated proteins offered comparable accuracy at lower computational cost.

Conclusions:

  • Covalent docking accuracy is influenced by warhead chemistry, ligand properties, and target accessibility.
  • No single tool consistently outperformed others; target-specific selection is recommended.
  • Noncovalent docking strategies can be a viable, cost-effective alternative.
  • Findings guide the development of improved covalent docking protocols and virtual screening strategies.