The method matters: The effect of handling time on cortisol level and blood parameters in wild cats

Blood analysis has recently become a popular tool to assess the welfare of the wild cats. However, the estimates of blood parameters may depend on the sampling method. We have tested (1) if the sampling procedure influences blood parameters and (2) what parameters are the most efficient in assessing the physiological status in wild cat species. We assessed the effect of handling time on red blood cells (RBC) and white blood cells (WBC) counts, the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (N/L ratio), and serum cortisol level within 1 hr after the capture of the animal in six far-east wild cats (Prionailurus bengalensis euptilura). Also, we analyzed literature data in 17 cat species to assess the effect of place of study, type of immobilization, and handling time on WBC count and N/L ratio. Serum cortisol level varied significantly with the handling time. RBC and WBC counts were strongly affected by the handling time. N/L ratio was very robust and did not depend on the handling time. However, the analysis of literature data has shown that the prolonged handling time (over 1 hr) and the type of immobilization significantly influence the N/L ratio, whereas the WBC count does not depend on any of considered factors. We conclude that while most blood parameters of cats are affected by routine handling time, the N/L ratio does not vary if the samples are collected within 1 hr after the capture of the animal. All other tested parameters should be treated with caution.