Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
Published on: April 26, 2014
Verification study on the NORIP LDH reference intervals with a proposed new upper reference limit
Søren Kristiansen1, Lennart Friis-Hansen1, Claus Antonio Juel Jensen1
1a Department of Clinical Biochemistry , Copenhagen University Hospital of Nordsjælland , Denmark.
Abstract:
We verified the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) reference interval (RI) provided by the Nordic Reference Interval Project (NORIP). The serum LDH concentration was analysed on the Dimension Vista 1500 system with an IFCC method with a bias of +2.1 % and +2.7 % against NFKK Reference Serum X and ERM-AD453/IFCC, respectively, showing verification of transference of the NORIP RI. Selective data mining in clinical laboratory information systems for retrospective serum LDH test results was used to calculate an indirect RI. For the adult age group (18 to <70 years) the limits of the interval was 127 U/L (90 % CI: 123-132 U/L) and 240 U/L (90 % CI: 234-243 U/L). However, the NORIP upper limit for the adult age group is 205 U/L (90 % CI: 198-210 U/L). Accordingly, 25.1 % of LDH test results were above the NORIPs upper limit of 205 U/L. If LDH analysis was requested by the hospital's medical departments, outpatient clinics or general practitioners 29.2 %, 26.2 % and 20.9 %, respectively, were above the 205 U/L limit. Differences in transport time before centrifugation of blood, and different transport principles could not explain the relative high percent of test results above the NORIP 205 U/L limit. The indirect finding of an upper limit of 240 U/L (90 % CI: 234-243 U/L), and the relative high number of test result >205 U/L, suggests that the NORIP upper limit should be adjusted.
Related Concept Videos
Inertial Frames of Reference
Non-inertial Frames of Reference
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

