Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform01:24

Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform

651
The z-transform is a powerful tool for analyzing practical discrete-time systems, often represented by linear difference equations. Solving a higher-order difference equation requires knowledge of the input signal and the initial conditions up to one term less than the order of the equation.
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
651
Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments01:12

Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments

6.0K
The cytoskeleton is a complex dynamic structure performing varied functions based on cellular requirements. The adaptability of the individual filaments in the cytoskeleton determines their ability to perform various functions within the cell. It can undergo rapid reorganization during processes like cell division or remain stable for several hours as in the interphase. The adaptability of these filaments depends on stringent regulatory mechanisms. The microfilament and microtubules of the...
6.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Consistency and changes in eye movements during static, dynamic, and audio-visual emotion processing.

Perception·2026
Same author

The influence of similarity, sensitivity and bias on letter identification.

Vision research·2026
Same author

fMRI measures of interocular luminance masking reflect rapid binocular plasticity.

Vision research·2025
Same author

Detection and identification of monocular, binocular, and dichoptic stimuli are mediated by binocular sum and difference channels.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

When two eyes are worse than one: Binocular summation for chromatic, interocular-anti-phase stimuli.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Simultaneous Regularity Contrast and Luminance Polarity.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

AI-generated faces are becoming more trustworthy.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Attenuated boundary extension in observer perspective memory compared to field perspective memory.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Comparing masking and habituation roles in saccadic omission of stimuli optimized for intra-saccadic vision.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.6K

Adaptation to interocular difference.

Frederick A A Kingdom1, Ben J Jennings2, Mark A Georgeson3

  • 1McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, MontrĂ©al General Hospital, MontrĂ©al, Canada.

Journal of Vision
|June 16, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain

More Related Videos

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K
Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation
08:04

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Published on: August 23, 2017

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.6K
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K
Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation
08:04

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Published on: August 23, 2017

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Binocular vision

Background:

  • Interocular differences (IDs) in visual stimuli, such as hue or contrast variations between the two eyes' views, can create a perception of luster.
  • This luster perception serves as a cue to distinguish non-identical patterns, differentiating them from perfectly matched ones.
  • The adaptability of the neural mechanisms responsible for detecting these interocular differences remains an area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the neural mechanism for detecting interocular differences (IDs) is adaptable.
  • To determine if adaptation to different types of visual patterns influences the ability to detect interocular differences.

Main Methods:

  • Stimuli consisted of horizontally oriented, multi-spatial-frequency grating patterns.
  • Interocular differences were manipulated using interocular phase differences in grating components.
  • Participants underwent adaptation to correlated, uncorrelated, monocular, or anticorrelated patterns.
  • Thresholds for detecting interocular differences were measured using a staircase procedure post-adaptation.

Main Results:

  • Adaptation to uncorrelated, monocular, and anticorrelated patterns significantly elevated interocular difference (ID) detection thresholds.
  • Adaptation to correlated patterns did not result in a significant elevation of ID thresholds.
  • Threshold elevation was most pronounced when adaptor and test grating orientations and spatial frequencies were closely matched.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the existence of a specialized neural mechanism dedicated to detecting interocular differences (IDs).
  • This specialized mechanism appears to be adaptable, as evidenced by the elevated detection thresholds following specific adaptation protocols.
  • The binocular differencing channel is proposed as the most probable candidate for this specialized ID detection mechanism.