Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

382
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
382

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of predicting free-breathing body contours from biplanar CT scout images for surface-guided DIBH radiotherapy.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Drug Abuse Prevention Program for Elementary School Children in Korea.

Psychiatry investigation·2026
Same author

The Efficacy of Cefazolin Alternatives for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prevention after Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Transfascial temporary fixation is associated with an increased rate of return to the operating room after gastrostomy tube dislodgement when compared to the subcutaneous stay suture technique: A single-institution retrospective analysis.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same author

SARLite: enhanced lightweight YOLO framework for SAR object detection.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Do ChatGPT and Gemini provide accurate answers to patient questions about glenohumeral arthritis?

JSES reviews, reports, and techniques·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Controlled Cervical Laceration Injury in Mice
07:28

Controlled Cervical Laceration Injury in Mice

Published on: May 9, 2013

17.1K

Errors in cervical spine immobilization during pediatric trauma evaluation.

Omar Z Ahmed1, Rachel B Webman1, Puja D Sheth1

  • 1Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, Dist. of Columbia.

The Journal of Surgical Research
|June 17, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cervical spine immobilization errors are common in pediatric trauma evaluations. Tasks involving oxygen and cervical collar manipulation increase the risk of these critical immobilization lapses.

Keywords:
Blunt traumaCervical spine immobilizationMedical team performancePediatric traumaTrauma resuscitation errors

More Related Videos

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
03:37

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry

Published on: June 6, 2025

471
An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
09:07

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model

Published on: May 31, 2017

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Controlled Cervical Laceration Injury in Mice
07:28

Controlled Cervical Laceration Injury in Mice

Published on: May 9, 2013

17.1K
Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
03:37

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry

Published on: June 6, 2025

471
An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
09:07

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model

Published on: May 31, 2017

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Pediatric Trauma Care
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Cervical spine immobilization is crucial in pediatric trauma to prevent secondary spinal cord injury.
  • Errors in maintaining immobilization can lead to significant patient harm.
  • Identifying factors contributing to these errors is essential for improving care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify factors during trauma evaluation that increase the likelihood of errors in cervical spine immobilization (lapses).
  • To analyze the association between specific tasks and immobilization lapses in pediatric trauma patients.

Main Methods:

  • Multivariate analysis of 56 pediatric trauma evaluations.
  • Assessment of patient characteristics, event features, and head/neck tasks.
  • Quantification of lapses in cervical spine immobilization.

Main Results:

  • Lapses occurred in 71.4% of patients, averaging 1.2 per patient.
  • Oxygen manipulation (12.2 tasks/patient) and cervical collar tasks (2.1 tasks/patient) were frequent.
  • Increased oxygen and cervical collar tasks were associated with higher lapse rates (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively).
  • Cervical collar placement/manipulation doubled the risk of a lapse (OR 1.92).
  • More lapses occurred during weekend evaluations (P=0.01).

Conclusions:

  • Errors in cervical spine immobilization are frequent in pediatric trauma evaluations.
  • Strategies to reduce errors should focus on head and neck management during trauma assessment.
  • Improving immobilization techniques, especially during oxygen and collar management, is vital.