Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing Innovative Therapeutic Strategies for Hemorrhagic Shock Research
Published on: March 22, 2024
Brivaracetam-induced elevation of carbamazepine epoxide levels: A post-hoc analysis from the clinical development
Martin J Brodie1, Toufic Fakhoury2, Belinda McDonough3
1Epilepsy Unit, West Glasgow ACH-Yorkhill, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract:
To assess the association, if any, between brivaracetam (BRV)-induced elevated carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (CBZ-E) and toxicity and efficacy in patients with epilepsy. Data were pooled from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies of adjunctive BRV in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures (N01252/NCT00490035, N01253/NCT00464269, N01358/NCT01261325). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of interest (ataxia, diplopia, dizziness, nystagmus, somnolence, accidental overdose or poisoning, and toxicity), discontinuations due to TEAEs, and serious TEAEs (SAEs) were assessed in subgroups who did/did not receive carbamazepine (CBZ) at study entry (CBZ+ and CBZ-). Logistic regression analysis evaluated CBZ-E/CBZ plasma concentrations and TEAEs. SAEs suggestive of CBZ-E toxicity were summarized from the BRV safety database up to a cut-off of October 1, 2014. Percent reduction in focal seizure frequency over placebo was assessed in subgroups of CBZ-E/CBZ ratios. Data from 1558 patients were included in the pooled safety population. Of these, concomitant CBZ was received by 184/459 (40.1%) placebo-treated and 315/803 (39.2%) BRV-treated patients (≥50 mg/day). In BRV-treated patients, study completion rates were similar in the CBZ+ (92.7%) and CBZ- (88.7%) groups; incidence of TEAEs of interest was similar (CBZ+ 24.4%; CBZ- 24.2%), and did not appear affected by CBZ dosage; SAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs were CBZ+ 1.6%; CBZ- 3.9% and 2.9%; 9.2%, respectively. Likelihood of TEAEs of interest decreased with increasing CBZ-E/CBZ ratio for BRV-treated patients: odds ratio 0.88 (95% confidence intervals 0.74, 1.03; p = 0.112). In the safety database, five SAEs suggestive of CBZ-E toxicity were identified. Efficacy outcomes did not appear to have a consistent pattern across CBZ-E/CBZ ratio subgroups. This post-hoc analysis does not support an association between CBZ-E levels and TEAEs potentially associated with CBZ-E toxicity, or with increases in efficacy. Overall, current evidence does not suggest that BRV dose adjustment is required with concomitant CBZ.
Related Concept Videos
Preparation of Epoxides
Epoxides result from alkene oxidation, which can be achieved by a) air, b) peroxy acids, c) hypochlorous acids, and d) halohydrin cyclization.
Epoxidation with Peroxy Acids
Epoxidation of alkenes via oxidation with peroxy acids involves the conversion of a carbon–carbon double bond to an epoxide using the oxidizing agent meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, commonly known as MCPBA. Since the O–O bond of peroxy acids is very weak, the addition of electrophilic oxygen of peroxy acids to...
Sharpless Epoxidation
Freezing Point Depression and Boiling Point Elevation
The boiling point of a liquid is the temperature at which its vapor pressure is equal to ambient atmospheric pressure. Since the vapor pressure of a solution is lowered due to the presence of nonvolatile solutes, it stands to reason that the solution’s boiling point will subsequently be increased. Vapor pressure increases with temperature, and so a solution will require a higher temperature than will pure solvent to achieve any given vapor pressure, including one...
Acid-Catalyzed Ring-Opening of Epoxides
Base-Catalyzed Ring-Opening of Epoxides
Structure and Nomenclature of Epoxides

