Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Semiquantitative analysis using standardized uptake value in 123I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT
Akira Toriihara1, Hiromitsu Daisaki2, Akihiro Yamaguchi3
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Specific Binding Ratio (SBR) is a valuable tool for diagnosing neurodegenerative diseases. Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) shows correlation but is less effective than SBR in 123I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT imaging.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiochemistry
- Neurology
Background:
- 123I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT is used to assess presynaptic dopaminergic deficits in neurodegenerative diseases.
- Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) and Specific Binding Ratio (SBR) are quantitative parameters used in SPECT imaging.
- Evaluating semiquantitative SUV methods against SBR is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic potential of semiquantitative Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) with Specific Binding Ratio (SBR) in 123I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT.
- To assess the accuracy of SUV measurements in a phantom study.
- To determine the efficacy of SUV-based parameters versus SBR in differentiating neurodegenerative diseases.
Main Methods:
- A phantom study validated SUV measurement accuracy.
- 52 patients with neurodegenerative diseases underwent 123I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT.
- SBR, various SUV metrics (max, peak, mean, ratio), and striatum-to-background SUV ratio (SUVratio) were calculated and compared with SBR using Pearson's correlation and diagnostic accuracy metrics.
Main Results:
- Phantom study showed SUV errors <10%.
- SUVratio demonstrated the strongest correlation with SBR (r=0.877, p<0.001).
- SBR outperformed SUVratio in diagnosing neurodegenerative diseases (accuracy: 92.3% vs 88.5%), with higher sensitivity (92.5% vs 85.0%) and comparable specificity (91.7% vs 100%).
Conclusions:
- Specific Binding Ratio (SBR) is a reliable parameter for aiding the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases.
- While SUV is technically acceptable, it may not offer superior clinical utility compared to SBR in 123I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT.
- SBR remains the preferred method for assessing presynaptic dopaminergic deficits with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT.
Related Concept Videos
Standard Enthalpy of Formation
Standard Electrode Potentials
Measurement: Standard Units
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

