Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

08:57
Focussed Ion Beam Milling and Scanning Electron Microscopy of Brain Tissue
Published on: July 6, 2011
28.8K
Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of aligner fit on teeth
The Angle Orthodontist
|June 19, 2018
Summary
This study compared the fit of Invisalign and CA-Clear Aligner systems on anchorage teeth using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Both systems showed comparable fit, with Invisalign excelling at gingival edges and CA-Clear Aligner on complex surfaces.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Technology
Background:
- Clear aligner orthodontics relies on precise aligner fit on anchorage teeth.
- Evaluating the marginal adaptation of different clear aligner systems is critical for treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally evaluate and compare the fitting accuracy of two clear aligner systems: Invisalign and CA-Clear Aligner.
- To assess aligner fit on specific anchorage teeth (incisors, premolars, molars) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Main Methods:
- Passive aligners from Invisalign and CA-Clear Aligner were adapted to resin casts derived from stereolithography (STL) files.
- Sections of aligners on teeth (incisors, premolars, molars) were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
- 160 micrometric measurements were taken and statistically analyzed using ANOVA tests.
Main Results:
- Invisalign demonstrated a significantly better overall fit on lower incisors and lower molars.
- Invisalign showed superior fit at the gingival edges of lower incisors and upper premolars.
- CA-Clear Aligner exhibited better fit on complex occlusal surfaces of upper molars, while Invisalign was better at the gingival edge of the buccal aspect.
Conclusions:
- Both Invisalign and CA-Clear Aligner systems offer comparable overall fit on anchorage teeth.
- Invisalign generally provides superior fit at the gingival margins of aligners.
- CA-Clear Aligner demonstrates better adaptation on intricate occlusal surfaces, suggesting system-specific strengths.
Related Concept Videos
Scanning Electron Microscopy
5.6K
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to study the surface features of a sample by using an electron beam that scans the sample surface in a two-dimensional manner. Typically, areas between ~1 centimeter to 5 micrometers in width can be imaged. SEM can be used to image bacteria, viruses, tissues as well as larger samples like insects. Conventional SEM gives a magnification ranging from 20X to 30,000X and spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nanometers.
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
5.6K
Teeth
1.8K
The formation of teeth, also known as odontogenesis, is a complex process that begins in utero, around the sixth week of embryonic development. There are three stages to this process: the bud stage, the cap stage, and the bell stage.
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
1.8K
Overview of Electron Microscopy
15.0K
The wavelengths of visible light ultimately limit the maximum theoretical resolution of images created by light microscopes. Most light microscopes can only magnify 1000X, and a few can magnify up to 1500X. Electrons, like electromagnetic radiation, can behave like waves, but with wavelengths of 0.005 nm, they produce significantly greater resolution up to 0.05 nm as compared to 500 nm for visible light. An electron microscope (EM) can create a sharp image that is magnified up to 2,000,000X.
15.0K
Transmission Electron Microscopy
7.3K
In 1931, physicist Ernst Ruska—building on the idea that magnetic fields can direct an electron beam just as lenses can direct a beam of light in an optical microscope—developed the first prototype of the electron microscope. This development led to the development of the field of electron microscopy. In the transmission electron microscope (TEM), electrons are produced by a hot tungsten element and accelerated by a potential difference in an electron gun, which gives them up to 400...
7.3K
Immunogold Electron Microscopy
5.5K
Immunoelectron microscopy utilizes immunogold labeling of endogenous proteins with specific antibodies to detect and localize these proteins in cells and tissues. The procedure provides insights into the distribution and quantification of protein under different stimulation conditions offering clues about their functions. Conjugating highly electron-dense gold particles with primary or secondary antibodies allow antigen detection on and within cells, with high resolution and specificity.
5.5K
Cryo-electron Microscopy
4.4K
Conventional electron microscopy (EM) involves dehydration, fixation, and staining of biological samples, which distorts the native state of biological molecules and results in several artifacts. Also, the high-energy electron beam damages the sample and makes it difficult to obtain high-resolution images. These issues can be addressed using cryo-EM, which uses frozen samples and gentler electron beams. The technique was developed by Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank, and Richard Henderson, for...
4.4K

