Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Design Consideration

Design Consideration

Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...

Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete

Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete

Considering the tensile strength of concrete involves recognizing that the theoretical strength of cement paste can be up to a thousand times higher than what is observed in practical applications. This significant discrepancy is largely attributed to the presence of microscopic cracks within the concrete. These cracks tend to amplify stress at their tips when a load is applied, a phenomenon explained by Griffith's theory of brittle fracture.
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen...

Transmission Line Design Considerations

Transmission Line Design Considerations

Aluminum has become the material of choice for overhead transmission lines, surpassing copper due to its abundance and cost-effectiveness. The most prevalent type is the aluminum conductor, steel-reinforced (ACSR), which combines aluminum strands around a steel core. Other variants include all-aluminum conductors (AAC), all-aluminum alloy conductors (AAAC), aluminum conductor alloy-reinforced (ACAR), and aluminum-clad steel conductors. Advanced designs, such as aluminum conductors with steel...

Special considerations while measuring pulse

Special considerations while measuring pulse

Assessing a patient's pulse is a fundamental skill in healthcare, but certain situations require special attention:

Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow

Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow

Open channel flow, where a fluid flows with a free surface exposed to the atmosphere, is primarily governed by gravitational and surface effects, distinguishing it from closed conduit or pipe flow. In open channels such as rivers, canals, and artificial channels, energy analysis provides valuable insights into flow behavior and the relationship between depth, velocity, and slope.Specific Energy and Flow DepthIn open channel flow, the specific energy, E, combines the gravitational potential...

One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: General Considerations

One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: General Considerations

The one-compartment model is a pharmacokinetic tool that models the body as a single, uniform compartment, facilitating the understanding of drug distribution and elimination. This model is particularly beneficial for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, where the drug rapidly circulates throughout the body.
The drug's presence in the body is defined by an equation representing the difference between the rates of drug entry and exit. Key parameters—elimination rate constant,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Pulsed field ablation in patients with a prior left atrial appendage closure device and concomitant leak closure.

Heart rhythm·2026

Same author

Feasibility of mapping and ablation of scar-related atrial flutter using a novel high-density 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system.

Heart rhythm·2026

Same author

Device Size or Residual Leak?: Stroke Risk in Borderline Left Atrial Appendage Anatomy.

JACC. Asia·2026

Same author

High-Voltage Pulsed Field Ablation: Novel Strategy for Redo Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026

Same author

Exploring resting-state network dysconnectivity in schizophrenia with single-subject ICA.

CNS spectrums·2026

Same author

VASCADE MVP-XL Versus VASCADE MVP for Large-Bore Venous Access-Site Closure in Electrophysiology Procedures: A Single-Center Experience on Efficacy and Complications.

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technical Considerations.

Marco Marino¹, Gaspare Gulotta¹, Andrzej L Komorowski²

¹1Department of Emergency and General Surgery, P. Giaccone Hospital, University of Palermo. Giuffrè L. str. 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy.

The Indian Journal of Surgery

|June 20, 2018

Summary

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy offers advantages in bleeding control and reconstruction. This advanced procedure is safe and feasible, with reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays, despite a learning curve.

Keywords:

Learning curve Operative technique Pancreatic fistula Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

Modified Single-Loop Reconstruction for Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Modified Single-Loop Reconstruction for Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

Modified Single-Loop Reconstruction for Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Modified Single-Loop Reconstruction for Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

Area of Science:

Surgical Technology
Gastrointestinal Surgery
Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy faces technical limitations.
Robotic surgery offers potential benefits like EndoWrist instruments and 3D visualization.
The adoption of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy remains limited and debated.

Purpose of the Study:

To detail crucial technical aspects for safe robotic pancreatectomy.
To review literature on robotic vs. laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
To evaluate the benefits of the robotic platform in pancreatic surgery.

Main Methods:

Description of a step-by-step surgical technique based on 52 robotic pancreatic resections (10 pancreaticoduodenectomies).
Analysis of troubleshooting encountered during initial center experience.
Literature review comparing robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes.

Main Results:

Reduced estimated blood loss and length of stay compared to conventional methods.
No significant increase in pancreatic fistula or other postoperative complications observed, despite the learning curve.
Demonstrated advantages in bleeding control and the reconstructive phase.

Conclusions:

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy is a technically demanding procedure requiring advanced laparoscopic and robotic skills.
The robotic approach is safe and feasible for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Clear benefits exist in managing bleeding and performing reconstruction during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.