Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Establishing Mixed Neuronal and Glial Cell Cultures from Embryonic Mouse Brains to Study Infection and Innate Immunity
Published on: June 30, 2023
Cell-surface signatures of immune dysfunction risk-stratify critically ill patients: INFECT study
Andrew Conway Morris1,2, Deepankar Datta3,4, Manu Shankar-Hari5
1University Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Box 93, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, England, UK. mozza@doctors.org.uk.
Cellular immune markers can predict secondary infections in critically ill patients. These markers help stratify infection risk between days 3-9 post-ICU admission, aiding targeted therapies.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Immunology
- Translational Research
Background:
- Cellular immune dysfunction is prevalent in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, increasing complication risks.
- Clinically applicable methods are needed to detect immune dysfunction for targeted treatment.
- Identifying immune dysfunction markers can stratify secondary infection risk in critically ill patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To confirm if cellular markers of immune dysfunction can stratify secondary infection risk in critically ill patients.
- To validate the use of neutrophil CD88, monocyte HLA-DR, and T regulatory cells as predictive markers.
- To assess the feasibility of standardized, multi-site flow cytometry for immune marker analysis.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational cohort study involving 138 critically ill patients across four UK ICUs.
- Serial blood samples were analyzed using standardized flow cytometry for neutrophil CD88, monocyte HLA-DR, and T regulatory cell percentages.
- Patients were monitored for the development of secondary infections.
Main Results:
- Reduced neutrophil CD88, reduced monocyte HLA-DR, and elevated T regulatory cells were associated with increased secondary infection risk (ORs 2.18-3.44).
- The cumulative burden of immune dysfunction correlated with progressive infection risk, from 14% to 59%.
- Risk stratification was effective between days 3 and 9 post-ICU admission, not immediately upon admission.
Conclusions:
- Three cell surface markers (neutrophil CD88, monocyte HLA-DR, T regulatory cells) effectively predict secondary infection risk in critically ill patients.
- Standardized, multi-site flow cytometry is feasible for assessing these immune markers.
- This approach provides a tool for targeting immunomodulatory therapies in ICU patients.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
What is the Immune System?
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Humoral Immune Responses
Cell-surface Signaling
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...

