Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Use of Animal Model of Sepsis to Evaluate Novel Herbal Therapies
Published on: April 11, 2012
Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different continuous blood Purification methods in treating infantile sepsis
1Department of Infectious Disease, Xuzhou Childrens Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Insights
High volume hemofiltration (HVHF) is a more effective treatment for infantile sepsis than continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). HVHF offers faster recovery and better reduction in inflammatory markers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Nephrology
- Intensive Care Medicine
Background:
- Sepsis is a life-threatening condition in infants, necessitating effective continuous blood purification (CBP) methods.
- Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and high volume hemofiltration (HVHF) are two CBP techniques used in treating infantile sepsis.
Discussion:
- This study compared the safety and efficacy of CVVH and HVHF in 86 pediatric sepsis patients.
- Key parameters evaluated included survival rates, hemodynamic stability, inflammatory markers, and disease severity scores.
- Results indicated no significant difference in survival or hemodynamic parameters between the two groups.
Key Insights:
- High volume hemofiltration (HVHF) demonstrated a significantly shorter blood filtration duration and lower APACHE II scores compared to CVVH.
- HVHF led to a more significant reduction in inflammatory markers such as procalcitonin, hs-CRP, and TXB2 post-therapy.
- HVHF is suggested to be a safer and more effective CBP method for infantile sepsis.
Outlook:
- Further research could explore long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of HVHF in pediatric sepsis.
- Optimizing HVHF protocols may enhance its benefits in managing severe pediatric infections.
- Investigating the precise mechanisms behind HVHF's superior inflammatory response modulation is warranted.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to compare the safety and the efficacy of two methods of continuous blood purification (CBP), continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and high volume hemofiltration (HVHF), for treatment of infantile sepsis. Eighty-six children with sepsis were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into two groups with 47 cases in the CVVH group and 39 cases in the HVHF group. Survival rate, duration of blood filtration, mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean heart rate and SaO2, APACHE II score, procalcitonin, hs-CRP and TXB2 were compared between the two groups. Results showed that survival rate, MAP, mean heart rate and SaO2 in the two groups did not have any significant differences. Duration of blood filtration and APACHE II score in the HVHF group was significantly shorter than that in the CVVH group. After therapy, levels of procalcitonin, hs-CRP and TXB2 declined dramatically in both groups, however this reduction was more significant in the HVHF group. We conclude that HVHF is a safer and more effective method as it produced stable hemodynamics, shorter filtration time, better APACHE II scores and better results in alleviating inflammatory reactions.
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Self-Efficacy
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety
Continuing Care
Continuity of a Function
Continuity Equation
The mass flow rate is expressed as:

