Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Marital status and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chun Wai Wong1, Chun Shing Kwok1, Aditya Narain1
1Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute for Applied Clinical Science and Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Keele and Academic Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Insights
Being unmarried, divorced, or widowed increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality after CVD events. Marital status is a significant factor in CVD risk assessment and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Social Science
Background:
- The impact of marital status on cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and prognosis remains unclear.
- Existing research presents conflicting evidence regarding the association between marital status and CVD outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize existing literature on how marital status influences the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
- To determine the effect of marital status on prognosis and mortality after a CVD event.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase databases up to January 2018.
- Prospective studies investigating the association between marital status and CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), or stroke incidence and mortality were included.
- Random effects meta-analysis was performed, calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) stratified by population type.
Main Results:
- The analysis included 34 studies with over two million participants.
- Unmarried individuals (never married, divorced, widowed) faced increased odds of CVD (OR 1.42), CHD (OR 1.16), CHD death (OR 1.43), and stroke death (OR 1.55) compared to married individuals.
- Divorced individuals had higher odds of CHD, and widowers had increased stroke mortality. Single individuals with myocardial infarction experienced higher mortality (OR 1.42).
Conclusions:
- Marital status significantly influences cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and outcomes.
- These findings suggest that marital status should be incorporated into CVD risk assessments.
- Further research is warranted to investigate the specific impact of marital status on CVD prognosis and outcomes.
Background:
The influence of marital status on the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and prognosis after CVD is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine how marital status influences CVD and prognosis after CVD.
Methods:
A search of MEDLINE and Embase in January 2018 without language restriction was performed to identify studies that evaluated the association between marital status and risk of CVD. Search terms related to both marital status and CVD were used and included studies had to be prospective in design. The outcomes of interest were CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke incidence and mortality. We performed random effects meta-analysis stratified by the types of population by calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Results:
Our analysis included 34 studies with more than two million participants. Compared with married participants, being unmarried (never married, divorced or widowed) was associated with increased odds of CVD (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.01), CHD (OR 1.16,95% CI 1.04 to 1.28), CHD death (OR 1.43,95% CI 1.28 to 1.60) and stroke death (OR 1.55,95% 1.16 to 2.08). Being divorced was associated with increased odds of CHD (P<0.001) for both men and women while widowers were more likely to develop a stroke (P<0.001). Single men and women with myocardial infarction had increased mortality (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.76) compared with married participants.
Conclusions:
Marital status appears to influence CVD and prognosis after CVD. These findings may suggest that marital status should be considered in the risk assessment for CVD and outcomes of CVD based on marital status merits further investigation.
More Related Videos
04:34Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Relative Risk