Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Comparative in vivo Study of gp96 Adjuvanticity in the Frog Xenopus laevis
Published on: September 16, 2010
Comparative evaluation of Enterococcus faecalis counts in different tapers of rotary system and irrigation fluids: An
Amir Arsalan Navabi1, Abbas Ali Khademi2, Masoud Khabiri1
1Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Background:
Bacteria and their by-products are etiological factors for the failure of endodontic treatment. Reduction of root canal bacterial contamination is one of the chief aims of root canal therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different rotary file tapers and two irrigation fluids on Enterococcus faecalis counts.
Materials And Methods:
In this ex vivo study Root canals of 72 human upper lateral incisors were enlarged to ISO #20 K-file. Then, the samples were sterilized and inoculated with E. faecalis for 72 h, divided into six experimental groups and prepared with #30 Flexmaster files with 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 tapers and two different irrigation solutions such as normal saline and sodium hypochlorite. The control group (n = 10) was subdivided into two groups with or without bacterial inoculation and no mechanical instrumentation. Cleaning efficacy was evaluated in terms of the reduction of colony forming units (CFUs). T-test, ANOVA, Duncan, and Tukey tests were applied to the groups. A significant level of α = 0.05 was set for comparison between the groups.
Results:
The canals instrumented with 0.06 taper exhibited greater significant reduction in CFUs compared to canals instrumented with 0.04 and 0.02 taper (P < 0.05); 0.04 taper also resulted in greater significant reduction in CFUs than 0.02 taper (P < 0.05). In addition, no significant differences were observed in E. faecalis counts between the two irrigation fluids (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
Under the conditions of this study, root canal preparation with greater taper resulted in canal cleanliness and better debridement.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
The Fluid Mosaic Model
Comparative Excretory Systems
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

