Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

10.2K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
10.2K
Absolute and Local Extreme Values01:22

Absolute and Local Extreme Values

84
The highest and lowest values of a function, relative to a reference axis, are known as extreme values. These include absolute maximum and absolute minimum values, which represent the highest and lowest points the function reaches across its entire domain. Within a restricted portion of the function, the highest and lowest values are referred to as local maximum and local minimum values, respectively.Periodic functions, such as sine and cosine, show extreme values at infinitely many points due...
84
Tumor Progression02:07

Tumor Progression

7.5K
Tumor progression is a phenomenon where the pre-formed tumor acquires successive mutations to become clinically more aggressive and malignant. In the 1950s, Foulds first described the stepwise progression of cancer cells through successive stages.
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
7.5K
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

25.6K
The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
25.6K
Standard Enthalpy of Formation02:37

Standard Enthalpy of Formation

49.3K
Enthalpy changes are typically tabulated for reactions in which both the reactants and products are at the same conditions. A standard state is a commonly accepted set of conditions used as a reference point for the determination of properties under other different conditions. For chemists, the IUPAC standard state refers to materials under a pressure of 1 bar and solutions at 1 M and does not specify a temperature. Many thermochemical tables list values with a standard state of 1 atm. Because...
49.3K
Standard Electrode Potentials03:02

Standard Electrode Potentials

50.4K
On comparing the reactivity of silver and lead, it is observed that the two ionic species, Ag+ (aq) and Pb2+ (aq), show a difference in their redox reactivity towards copper: the silver ion undergoes spontaneous reduction, while the lead ion does not. This relative redox activity can be easily quantified in electrochemical cells by a property called cell potential. This property is commonly known as cell voltage in electrochemistry, and it is a measure of the energy which accompanies the charge...
50.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Effect and mechanism of astaxanthin on the aging of high glucose-treated human skin fibroblasts].

Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi·2025
Same author

Unusual blister on the arm.

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2025
Same author

Discussion on Standardization of Forensic Assessment of Olfactory Dysfunction.

Fa yi xue za zhi·2019
Same author

Lack of evidence that beta blocker use reduces knee pain, areas of joint pain, or analgesic use among individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2019
Same author

Progress on the Muscle Function Evaluation and Its Forensic Application.

Fa yi xue za zhi·2019
Same author

Association analysis of the major histocompatibility complex region in psoriasis vulgaris.

The British journal of dermatology·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
08:45

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Published on: March 28, 2018

11.4K

[Research Progress on Function Evaluation Standard and Method of Lower Extremity Impairment].

M Zhang1,2, L H Fan2, D Ran2

  • 1College of Criminal Justice, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China.

Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi
|June 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Lower extremity impairment lacks standardized evaluation, complicating damage compensation and forensic identification. This review examines current standards and methods to guide future research on objective impairment assessment.

Keywords:
evaluation of impairment functionforensic medicinelower extremityreviewstandard

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
08:27

Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Published on: September 2, 2021

4.8K
A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia
07:56

A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia

Published on: October 10, 2020

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
08:45

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Published on: March 28, 2018

11.4K
Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
08:27

Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Published on: September 2, 2021

4.8K
A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia
07:56

A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia

Published on: October 10, 2020

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Forensic Medicine
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Lower extremity impairment results from various causes including illness, accidents, and injuries to joints, nerves, muscles, and tendons.
  • Such impairments can lead to significant lower extremity dysfunction.
  • Currently, there is a lack of unified international and domestic standards for evaluating lower extremity impairment, with existing methods varying even within the same field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and summarize the existing standards, methods, and current status of lower extremity impairment function evaluation.
  • To highlight the challenges and disputes arising from the lack of standardized evaluation in forensic medicine and damage compensation.
  • To provide insights for future research aimed at standardizing the assessment of lower extremity impairment.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing studies on lower extremity impairment evaluation.
  • Analysis of current standards and methodologies used in different regions and fields.
  • Synthesis of findings to identify gaps and inconsistencies in the research system.

Main Results:

  • Identified a significant lack of a unified and complete research system for lower extremity impairment evaluation.
  • Highlighted the variability and differences in evaluation standards across domestic and international contexts.
  • Confirmed that the degree of lower extremity impairment significantly influences personal damage compensation, often leading to disputes.

Conclusions:

  • The absence of standardized evaluation methods for lower extremity impairment poses challenges in forensic medicine and compensation.
  • Further research is crucial for developing a comprehensive and standardized system for assessing lower extremity impairment.
  • Standardization will improve objectivity in legal and medical assessments, reducing disputes and ensuring fair compensation.