Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
Published on: November 6, 2016
Examining variation in interstage mortality rates across the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement
Katherine E Bates1, Sunkyung Yu1, Ray Lowery1
11Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases,Congenital Heart Center,C.S. Mott Children's Hospital,Ann Arbor,MI,USA.
Insights
Interstage mortality variation in hypoplastic left heart syndrome persists despite improvements. Differences in care practices, not patient risk factors, likely explain survival disparities between pediatric cardiology centers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Congenital Heart Disease Research
- Quality Improvement Science
Background:
- Interstage mortality for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) shows persistent variation across centers.
- The National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative has reduced overall mortality, but center-specific differences remain.
- It is unclear if these variations are due to patient risk factors or care delivery differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether differences in baseline risk factors explain the variation in interstage mortality rates among centers.
- To compare centers with lower interstage mortality to those with higher rates within the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative.
Main Methods:
- Defined lower-mortality centers (>25 consecutive interstage survivors) and higher-mortality centers (>10% cumulative interstage mortality).
- Compared established baseline risk factors and perioperative characteristics between these two groups of centers.
- Utilized multivariable analysis to adjust for potential confounding variables.
Main Results:
- Seven lower-mortality centers (2.7% mortality) and four higher-mortality centers (13.3% mortality) were identified.
- Postnatal diagnosis was the only baseline risk factor that differed significantly between groups (18.4% vs. 31.8%).
- Significant mortality differences persisted even after adjusting for postnatal diagnosis, indicating other factors are involved.
Conclusions:
- Differences in baseline patient risk factors do not explain the observed variation in interstage mortality for HLHS.
- Further research is needed to explore variations in care practices and identify specific targets for quality improvement efforts.
- Understanding and addressing care practice variations is crucial for reducing interstage mortality disparities.
Background:
Although interstage mortality for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome has declined within the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative, variation across centres persists. It remains unclear whether centres with lower interstage mortality have lower-risk patients or whether differences in care may explain this variation. We examined previously established risk factors across National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative centres with lower and higher interstage mortality rates.
Methods:
Lower-mortality centres were defined as those with >25 consecutive interstage survivors. Higher-mortality centres were defined as those with cumulative interstage mortality rates >10%, which is a collaborative historic baseline rate. Baseline risk factors and perioperative characteristics were compared.
Results:
Seven lower-mortality centres were identified (n=331 patients) and had an interstage mortality rate of 2.7%, as compared with 13.3% in the four higher-mortality centres (n=173 patients, p<0.0001). Of all baseline risk factors examined, the only factor that differed between the lower- and higher-mortality centres was postnatal diagnosis (18.4 versus 31.8%, p=0.001). In multivariable analysis, there remained a significant mortality difference between the two groups of centres after adjusting for this variable: adjusted mortality rate was 2.8% in lower-mortality centres compared with 12.6% in higher-mortality centres, p=0.003. Secondary analyses identified multiple differences between groups in perioperative practices and other variables.
Conclusions:
Variation in interstage mortality rates between these two groups of centres does not appear to be explained by differences in baseline risk factors. Further study is necessary to evaluate variation in care practices to identify targets for improvement efforts.
More Related Videos
05:47Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
Published on: August 29, 2025
02:32Author Spotlight: Novel Intraperitoneal Injection Method for Zebrafish Cardiotoxicity Models
Published on: March 29, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
What is Variation?
The range, standard deviation, standard error, and variance are the different measures of variation.
Range: The range is the difference between its maximum and...
National Nursing Organizations I