Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

425
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
425
Introduction to Statistical Process Control01:15

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

659
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a method used to monitor and control quality within processes, particularly in manufacturing and service delivery, by employing statistical methods. SPC aims to distinguish between natural (common cause) variation and variation due to specific changes or events (special cause), allowing for timely improvements and sustained quality. The control chart, a pivotal tool in SPC, visually displays data over time alongside a central line of upper and lower control...
659
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

22.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
22.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

23.5K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
23.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Regulation of focal adhesion dynamics and cell motility by the EB2 and Hax1 protein complex.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2019
Same author

Chemical Syntheses and Chemical Biology of Carboxyl Polyether Ionophores: Recent Highlights.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2019
Same author

Cholesterol content in cell membrane maintains surface levels of ErbB2 and confers a therapeutic vulnerability in ErbB2-positive breast cancer.

Cell communication and signaling : CCS·2019
Same author

Exercise interventions on patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review.

Clinical rehabilitation·2019
Same author

Long-term creep deformations in colloidal calcium-silicate-hydrate gels by accelerated aging simulations.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2019
Same author

Microconcave MAPbBr<sub>3</sub> Single Crystal for High-Performance Photodetector.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2019
Same journal

Towards a Unified Theory for Semiparametric Data Fusion with Individual-Level Data.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

One-Step Estimation of Differentiable Hilbert-Valued Parameters.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

GENERALIZATION ERROR BOUNDS OF DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES IN PENALIZED REGRESSION-BASED LEARNING.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

EFFICIENT AND MULTIPLY ROBUST RISK ESTIMATION UNDER GENERAL FORMS OF DATASET SHIFT.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

TESTING HIGH-DIMENSIONAL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS IN LINEAR MODELS.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

COUNTERFACTUAL INFERENCE IN SEQUENTIAL EXPERIMENTS.

Annals of statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.5K

I-LAMM FOR SPARSE LEARNING: SIMULTANEOUS CONTROL OF ALGORITHMIC COMPLEXITY AND STATISTICAL ERROR.

Jianqing Fan1,2, Han Liu2, Qiang Sun3

  • 1School of Data Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Annals of Statistics
|June 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We introduce the iterative local adaptive majorize-minimization (I-LAMM) framework to balance computational cost and statistical accuracy in high-dimensional models. This method offers optimal statistical performance with controlled complexity for nonconvex optimization problems.

Keywords:
Algorithmic statisticsiteration complexitylocal adaptive MMnonconvex statistical optimizationoptimal rate of convergence

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.1K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.5K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.1K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational statistics
  • Optimization theory
  • High-dimensional data analysis

Background:

  • Fitting high-dimensional models often involves a trade-off between algorithmic complexity and statistical error.
  • Nonconvex optimization problems present significant challenges in achieving both efficiency and accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel computational framework, iterative local adaptive majorize-minimization (I-LAMM), for fitting high-dimensional models.
  • To simultaneously control algorithmic complexity and statistical error in nonconvex optimization.
  • To provide theoretical guarantees for optimal statistical performance and controlled algorithmic complexity.

Main Methods:

  • I-LAMM employs a two-stage approach based on local linear approximation of folded concave penalized quasi-likelihood.
  • The first stage solves a convex program with coarse precision for an initial estimator.
  • The second stage refines the estimator by iteratively solving convex programs with increasing precision.

Main Results:

  • Theoretical analysis establishes a phase transition in iteration complexity: sublinear in the first stage, linear in the second.
  • Demonstrates optimal statistical performances and controlled algorithmic complexity for a broad class of nonconvex problems.
  • Establishes a contraction property showing iteration effects on statistical errors and provides optimality guarantees under weak assumptions.

Conclusions:

  • I-LAMM offers a robust algorithmic solution for high-dimensional statistical modeling with nonconvex objectives.
  • The framework achieves superior performance with weaker signal strength requirements compared to existing methods.
  • Numerical results validate the theoretical findings, supporting the efficacy of I-LAMM.