Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantum Numbers02:43

Quantum Numbers

51.9K
It is said that the energy of an electron in an atom is quantized; that is, it can be equal only to certain specific values and can jump from one energy level to another but not transition smoothly or stay between these levels.
51.9K
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom02:45

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

59.2K
Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing hydrogen spectra.
59.2K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emergent Universal Drag Law in a Model of Superflow.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Statistical Uncertainty in Paleoclimate Proxy Reconstructions.

Geophysical research letters·2022
Same author

Extreme ecchymoses in a migraine patient using concomitant treatment with calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antibodies and fish oil supplements: a case report.

BMC neurology·2021
Same author

Oxygen isotope effects during microbial sulfate reduction: applications to sediment cell abundances.

The ISME journal·2020
Same author

Direct Observation of the Dynamics of Single-Cell Metabolic Activity during Microbial Diauxic Growth.

mBio·2020
Same author

Controlled Asymmetry of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering with an Injected Nondegenerate Optical Parametric Oscillator.

Physical review letters·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Probing the Structure and Dynamics of Interfacial Water with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy
10:28

Probing the Structure and Dynamics of Interfacial Water with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy

Published on: May 27, 2018

9.5K

Mesoscopic Dynamical Differences from Quantum State Preparation in a Bose-Hubbard Trimer.

M K Olsen1,2, T W Neely1,3, A S Bradley2

  • 1School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.

Physical Review Letters
|June 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Quantum effects in Bose-Hubbard trimers unexpectedly grow with system size, challenging classical predictions. Simple atomic number measurements reveal these observable dynamics, offering new insights into quantum systems.

More Related Videos

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots
10:16

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots

Published on: October 23, 2014

26.1K
Compact Quantum Dots for Single-molecule Imaging
17:14

Compact Quantum Dots for Single-molecule Imaging

Published on: October 9, 2012

18.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Probing the Structure and Dynamics of Interfacial Water with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy
10:28

Probing the Structure and Dynamics of Interfacial Water with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy

Published on: May 27, 2018

9.5K
Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots
10:16

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots

Published on: October 23, 2014

26.1K
Compact Quantum Dots for Single-molecule Imaging
17:14

Compact Quantum Dots for Single-molecule Imaging

Published on: October 9, 2012

18.7K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum physics
  • Atomic physics
  • Condensed matter physics

Background:

  • Classical physics predicts quantum effects diminish with increasing system size.
  • Mean-field classical equations typically describe large quantum systems.
  • Bose-Hubbard models are crucial for understanding interacting quantum particles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate quantum dynamics in a Bose-Hubbard trimer system.
  • To challenge the conventional understanding of quantum effects in larger systems.
  • To propose an experiment demonstrating observable quantum phenomena that increase with system size.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized newly developed theoretical and experimental techniques.
  • Proposed and analyzed an experiment using a Bose-Hubbard trimer.
  • Focused on differences in the preparation of a centrally evacuated trimer.

Main Results:

  • Observed that quantum effects can increase with system size in a Bose-Hubbard trimer.
  • Found that initial trimer preparation leads to readily observable differences in dynamics.
  • Demonstrated that these dynamic differences amplify as the system size grows.

Conclusions:

  • Quantum effects in Bose-Hubbard trimers do not necessarily disappear with increasing system size.
  • Initial conditions significantly influence observable quantum dynamics.
  • Simple atomic number measurements are sufficient to detect these quantum phenomena.