Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

560
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
560
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints01:16

Structural Joints: Synovial Joints

7.1K
Synovial joints are the most common type of joint in the body. A key structural characteristic for a synovial joint is the presence of a joint cavity. This fluid-filled space is where the articulating surfaces of the bones contact each other. Also, unlike fibrous or cartilaginous joints, the articulating bone surfaces at a synovial joint are not directly connected to each other with fibrous connective tissue or cartilage. This gives the bones of a synovial joint the ability to move smoothly...
7.1K
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints01:03

Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints

3.8K
Fibrous joints are a type of joint where the bones are connected by fibrous connective tissue. These joints provide stability and minimal to no movement between the articulating bones. There are three types of fibrous joints.
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...
3.8K
Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints01:17

Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints

4.1K
As the name indicates, at a cartilaginous joint, the adjacent bones are united by cartilage, a tough but flexible type of connective tissue. Unlike synovial joints, these types of joints lack a joint cavity and involve bones joined together by either hyaline cartilage or fibrocartilage.
There are two types of cartilaginous joints:
Synchondrosis
A synchondrosis ("joined by cartilage") is a cartilaginous joint where bones are connected by hyaline cartilage. Synchondrosis may be temporary...
4.1K
Joints01:26

Joints

35.8K
Joints, also called articulations or articular surfaces, are points at which ligaments or other tissues connect adjacent bones. Joints permit movement and stability, and can be classified based on their structure or function.
Structural joint classifications are based on the material that makes up the joint as well as whether or not the joint contains a space between the bones. Joints are structurally classified as fibrous, cartilaginous, or synovial.
Fibrous Joints Are Immovable
The bones of a...
35.8K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

964
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
964

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does it sound like a problem? Knee crepitus prevalence and self-reported frequency in runners with and without knee surgery and its association with knee osteoarthritis beliefs.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same author

Knee Osteoarthritis on MRI in Symptomatic Young Adults After ACL Reconstruction From the SUPER-Knee Trial: Feature Prevalence and Association With Early-Stage Clinical Osteoarthritis Criteria.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Five years on, NO PROGRESS: the gender equity crisis in sport and exercise medicine publishing persists - action is now overdue.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Proximal Calf Muscle Cross-Sectional Area After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Longitudinal MRI Evaluation.

Journal of sport rehabilitation·2026
Same author

We Thought You'd Never Ask: Insights From the Health of Elite Retired Australian Female Athletes Survey.

Journal of sport rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Classification approaches used to grade radiographic patellofemoral osteoarthritis: A scoping review.

Osteoarthritis imaging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
06:53

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics

Published on: February 28, 2025

1.0K

Is Running Better than Walking for Reducing Hip Joint Loads?

Anthony G Schache1,2, Yi-Chung Lin1, Kay M Crossley2

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
|June 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Running at faster speeds can reduce hip contact forces per unit distance compared to walking. This finding is crucial for optimizing rehabilitation for hip conditions.

More Related Videos

Lower-Limb Biomechanical Characteristics Associated with Unplanned Gait Termination Under Different Walking Speeds
05:52

Lower-Limb Biomechanical Characteristics Associated with Unplanned Gait Termination Under Different Walking Speeds

Published on: August 25, 2020

5.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
08:40

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs

Published on: April 19, 2024

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
06:53

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics

Published on: February 28, 2025

1.0K
Lower-Limb Biomechanical Characteristics Associated with Unplanned Gait Termination Under Different Walking Speeds
05:52

Lower-Limb Biomechanical Characteristics Associated with Unplanned Gait Termination Under Different Walking Speeds

Published on: August 25, 2020

5.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
08:40

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs

Published on: April 19, 2024

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Locomotion
  • Musculoskeletal System

Background:

  • Understanding hip biomechanics is vital for effective rehabilitation of hip conditions.
  • Hip contact force (HCF) and muscle contributions are key factors in locomotion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare lower-limb muscle contributions to HCF between walking and running.
  • To compare absolute and per-unit-distance (PUD) hip loads during walking and running.

Main Methods:

  • Collected kinematic and ground reaction force data from 8 healthy participants during walking and running at various speeds.
  • Utilized a 3D musculoskeletal model to calculate HCF and muscle contributions.
  • Quantified HCF impulse, PUD impulse, and PUD force.

Main Results:

  • HCF magnitude was greater during stance than swing, largest in the inferior-superior direction.
  • Gluteus medius, iliopsoas, and gluteus maximus were major contributors to stance HCF.
  • Faster running (3.47 m/s) showed the lowest PUD impulse and force.

Conclusions:

  • Faster running at 3.47 m/s resulted in lower hip PUD loads compared to other conditions.
  • Reduced PUD loads during faster running are attributed to increased stride distance and shorter stride duration.