Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Polarization and Characterization of M1 and M2 Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages on Implant Surfaces
Published on: December 6, 2024
Characterization of methanthelinium binding and function at human M1-M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors
Matthias Irmen1, Janine Holze1, Theresa Bödefeld1
1Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Straße 3, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Abstract:
Firstly, it was determined whether methanthelinium bromide (MB) binds to human M1-M5 (hM1-hM5) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in comparison to the classical muscarinic antagonist N-methylscopolamine (NMS). [3H]NMS dissociation binding experiments revealed an allosteric retardation of dissociation at 100 μM of MB ranging from none in hM3 to 4.6-fold in hM2 receptors. Accordingly, global non-linear regression analysis of equilibrium inhibition binding curves between [3H]NMS (0.2 and 2.0 nM) and MB was applied and compared using either an allosteric or a competitive model. The allosteric cooperativity of MB binding within MB/NMS/hM receptor complexes was strongly negative and undistinguishable from a competitive interaction throughout all subtypes. Applying the competitive model to the equilibrium binding data of MB and NMS, suggested competition at all hM subtypes: logKI (± S.E.) hM3 = 8.71 ± 0.15, hM1 = 8.68 ± 0.14, hM5 = 8.58 ± 0.07, hM2 = 8.27 ± 0.07 to hM4 = 8.25 ± 0.11. Secondly, the effects of MB on acetylcholine (ACh) induced hM receptor function showed very strong negative allosteric cooperativity at all subtypes pointing against an allosteric antagonism of MB with ACh. Competition with ACh was characterized by logKB: hM1 = 9.53 ± 0.05, hM4 = 9.33 ± 0.05, hM5 = 8.80 ± 0.05, hM2 = 8,79 ± 0.06, to hM3 = 8.43 ± 0.04. In conclusion, MB, below 1 μM, binds competitively and non-selectively (except for the difference between hM3 vs. hM4) to all five hM receptor subtypes with nanomolar affinity and is able to functionally inhibit ACh responses in a competitive fashion, with a slight subtype preference for hM1 and hM4.
More Related Videos
10:04Local Application of Drugs to Study Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Function in Mouse Brain Slices
Published on: October 29, 2012
07:09Subcutaneous Administration of Muscarinic Antagonists and Triple-Immunostaining of the Levator Auris Longus Muscle in Mice
Published on: September 8, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Cholinergic Receptors: Muscarinic
The subtypes M1, M3, and M5 couple with the Gq subunit and activate the phospholipase C (PLC) activity, mobilizing intracellular Ca2+....
Antiasthma Drugs: Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists
Antimuscarinic agents compete with ACh for the same binding site on the muscarinic receptors. By binding to these receptors, they inhibit the downstream effects of ACh and block the parasympathetic...
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Internal Receptors
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Receptor-mediated Endocytosis