Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026
Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography
Daniel Förnvik1, Hannie Förnvik1, Andreas Fieselmann2
1Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Medical Radiology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Inga Marie Nilssons gata 49, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Objectives:
To compare software estimates of volumetric breast density (VBD) based on breast tomosynthesis (BT) projections to those based on digital mammography (DM) images in a large screening cohort, the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST).
Methods:
DM and BT images of 9909 women (enrolled 2010-2015) were retrospectively analysed with prototype software to estimate VBD. Software calculation is based on a physics model of the image acquisition process and incorporates the effect of masking in DM based on accumulated dense tissue areas. VBD (continuously and categorically) was compared between BT [central projection (mediolateral oblique view (MLO)] and two-view DM, and with radiologists' BI-RADS density 4th ed. scores. Agreement and correlation were investigated with weighted kappa (κ), Spearman's correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results:
There was a high correlation (r = 0.83) between VBD in DM and BT and substantial agreement between the software breast density categories [observed agreement, 61.3% and 84.8%; κ = 0.61 and ĸ = 0.69 for four (a/b/c/d) and two (fat involuted vs. dense) density categories, respectively]. There was moderate agreement between radiologists' BI-RADS scores and software density categories in DM (ĸ = 0.55) and BT (ĸ = 0.47).
Conclusions:
In a large public screening setting, we report a substantial agreement between VBD in DM and BT using software with special focus on masking effect. This automated and objective mode of measuring VBD may be of value to radiologists and women when BT is used as the primary breast cancer screening modality.
Key Points:
• There was a high correlation between continuous volumetric breast density in DM and BT. • There was substantial agreement between software breast density categories (four groups) in DM and BT; with clinically warranted binary software breast density categories, the agreement increased markedly. • There was moderate agreement between radiologists' BI-RADS scores and software breast density categories in DM and BT.
More Related Videos
12:23Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound
Published on: August 14, 2012
11:34Building Up a High-throughput Screening Platform to Assess the Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancers
Published on: December 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
02:57The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
01:06What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
00:56Density
01:20Estimation of k and VD of Aminoglycosides
02:26Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids
01:13Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...