Utilization of Facial Image Analysis Technology for Blink Detection: A Validation Study
Momoko Kitazawa1, Michitaka Yoshimura, Kuo-Ching Liang
1Department of Ophthalmology (M.K., M.Y., L.K.-C., K.T.), Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; RIKEN (M.K., S.W.), Center for Advanced Photonics, Wako, Saitama, Japan; Department of Psychiatry (M.K., M.M., T.K.), Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and Department of Psychiatry (T.K.), Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, NY.
Purpose:
The assessment of anterior eye diseases and the understanding of psychological functions of blinking can benefit greatly from a validated blinking detection technology. In this work, we proposed an algorithm based on facial recognition built on current video processing technologies to automatically filter and analyze blinking movements. We compared electrooculography (EOG), the gold standard of blinking measurement, with manual video tape recording counting (mVTRc) and our proposed automated video tape recording analysis (aVTRa) in both static and dynamic conditions to validate our aVTRa method.
Methods:
We measured blinking in both static condition, where the subject was sitting still with chin fixed on the table, and dynamic condition, where the subject's face was not fixed and natural communication was taking place between the subject and interviewer. We defined concordance of blinks between measurement methods as having less than 50 ms difference between eyes opening and closing.
Results:
The subjects consisted of seven healthy Japanese volunteers (3 male, four female) without significant eye disease with average age of 31.4±7.2. The concordance of EOG vs. aVTRa, EOG vs. mVTRc, and aVTRa vs. mVTRc (average±SD) were found to be 92.2±10.8%, 85.0±16.5%, and 99.6±1.0% in static conditions and 32.6±31.0%, 28.0±24.2%, and 98.5±2.7% in dynamic conditions, respectively.
Conclusions:
In static conditions, we have found a high blink concordance rate between the proposed aVTRa versus EOG, and confirmed the validity of aVTRa in both static and dynamic conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Muscles for Facial Expressions
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Hybridoma Technology
Hybridoma Selection
Commonly used fusion techniques — electroporation,...


