Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
Published on: July 10, 2017
Vulnerability as practice in diagnosing multiple conditions.
Lindsay-Ann Coyle1, Sarah Atkinson1
1Institute for Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK.
This study redefines vulnerability, showing how medical diagnosis practices amplify it for patients with multiple conditions. It highlights how institutionalized medicine can worsen patient vulnerability beyond inherent conditions or social inequalities.
Area of Science:
- Sociology of Health and Illness
- Medical Sociology
- Disability Studies
Background:
- Vulnerability is broadly understood in biomedicine as inherent to certain conditions or linked to structural inequalities.
- Philosophical and feminist perspectives view vulnerability as a universal human experience and a potential resource for resistance.
- Medical and psychiatric diagnosis has been a focus of social critique and activism.
Purpose of the Study:
- To expand contemporary understandings of vulnerability by examining its generation through institutionalized diagnostic practices.
- To explore how people with multiple conditions experience vulnerability within the diagnostic process.
- To propose a combined approach to vulnerability that integrates universal, structural, and practice-based dimensions.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study employing face-to-face interviews with individuals living with multiple conditions.
- Analysis of experiential accounts of navigating diagnostic practices, primarily at the primary care level.
- Focus on identifying harmful aspects of diagnostic procedures that exacerbate vulnerability.
Main Results:
- Five harmful aspects of diagnostic practice were identified: temporal sequencing, diagnostic authority, medical specialization, strategic symptom selection, and medical isolation.
- These practices exacerbate patient vulnerability, extending beyond inherent conditions or structural inequalities.
- Diagnostic practices are embedded within the institution of diagnosis, not solely due to power asymmetries in consultations.
Conclusions:
- Vulnerability is a universal human condition amplified by institutionalized medical practices, particularly diagnosis.
- Diagnostic practices can significantly exacerbate vulnerability for individuals with multiple conditions.
- A comprehensive understanding of vulnerability requires considering its universal, structural, and practice-based dimensions within healthcare settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
Multiple Allele Traits
Characteristics of Practical Op Amps
The ratio of differential gain to the common-mode gain is defined as the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR). This ratio quantifies the ability of operational amplifiers (op-amps) to reject common-mode...
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Equivalent Circuits for Practical Transformers
In a practical transformer, each winding exhibits resistance and leakage reactance. The...
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...

