Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

44.4K
Overview
44.4K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Distance Problem01:29

Distance Problem

74
When an object's velocity changes over time, the total distance traveled can be determined by summing small displacement intervals over short increments. This approach approximates the true distance through numerical summation and the use of integral calculus. An estimate of the total displacement can be obtained by measuring velocity at regular intervals and multiplying each value by the corresponding time step.If a runner accelerates over the first three seconds of a race, speed measurements...
74
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

12.2K
 The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
12.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mapping shared and specific cortical after-effects of repetitive TMS on brain function.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Feeling good, staying low-carbon: the serial mediating roles of perceived social worth and pride.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Reciprocity norms can promote dishonesty in children.

Child development·2026
Same author

Intuitive or deliberative dishonesty: The effect of abstract versus concrete victim.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Same behavior, different perspectives: direct reciprocity differences between children with autism and children with typical development.

BMC psychiatry·2025
Same author

Moral Stories Can Promote Honesty in Chinese Young Children.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

Effects of integrating a structured design thinking strategy into generative AI-supported design learning on students' design achievement, creative self-efficacy, and problem-solving skills.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Fukushima treated water release and marine sports.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Mindful parenting and preschoolers' screen dependency behavior: the mediating role of parent-child relationship and the moderating role of effortful control.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Dynamic relationships among first-year university students' critical thinking, academic self-concept, and student engagement: a cross-lagged study.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

The association between academic major identity and career decision-making difficulty among Chinese college students: a sequential indirect association model of psychological capital and career adaptability.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Job quality and fertility intentions among Chinese migrant workers: the role of traditional fertility beliefs.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Self-Distancing Reduces Probability-Weighting Biases.

Qingzhou Sun1, Huanren Zhang2, Liyang Sai3

  • 1Institute of Brain and Management Sciences, College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Frontiers in Psychology
|June 29, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Self-distancing reduces biases in how people weigh probability information. This psychological strategy helps individuals make more accurate valuations of lotteries, unlike self-immersing which increases distortion.

Keywords:
probability-weighting biasprobability-weighting functionself-distancingself-immersingvaluation task

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Individuals often exhibit biases when evaluating probability information.
  • These biases can significantly impact decision-making and financial valuations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effectiveness of self-distancing as a strategy to mitigate probability-weighting biases.
  • To compare the impact of self-distancing versus self-immersing on probability valuation.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were assigned to either a self-distancing or self-immersing group.
  • Lottery valuations were assessed under different regulatory strategies.
  • A baseline group was used for comparison.

Main Results:

  • The self-distancing group showed reduced distortion in their probability-weighting function.
  • The self-immersing group demonstrated increased distortion compared to the baseline.
  • Self-distancing improved the accuracy of probability assessments.

Conclusions:

  • Self-distancing is an effective psychological tool for reducing probability-weighting biases.
  • This strategy enhances rational decision-making in probabilistic contexts.
  • Findings support the application of self-distancing in improving financial and probabilistic judgments.