Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Optimal reperfusion strategy in patients with acute STEMI and multivessel disease-an updated meta-analysis
1Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Insights
Complete revascularization (CR) significantly reduces major adverse cardiac events, mortality, and myocardial infarction in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease compared to culprit-only revascularization (COR). CR is both safe and effective.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel disease presents complex treatment challenges.
- Optimal reperfusion strategy remains a critical area of investigation for STEMI patients.
- Comparing culprit-only revascularization (COR) versus complete revascularization (CR) is essential for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of COR and CR in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
- To determine the optimal reperfusion strategy for this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Systematic meta-analysis of published multicenter randomized controlled trials.
- Searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases.
- Analyzed data using Review Manager 5.3 software.
Main Results:
- Eight trials involving 2870 patients (1604 COR, 1266 CR) were included.
- CR significantly reduced major adverse cardiac events (MACE), mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization compared to COR.
- No significant differences in safety outcomes (contrast-induced nephropathy, stroke, bleeding) were observed between CR and COR.
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization (CR) is an efficacious reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
- CR demonstrates a favorable safety profile, comparable to COR.
- The findings support CR as the preferred strategy for optimal outcomes in this patient group.
Background:
This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of culprit-only revascularization (COR) and complete revascularization (CR) in the treatment of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease to determine the optimal reperfusion strategy.
Method:
We analyzed published multicenter randomized controlled trials to compare COR and CR in patients with acute STEMI and multivessel disease. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases were searched, and the meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software.
Results:
Eight multicenter randomized controlled trials were selected involving 2870 patients, of whom 1604 underwent COR and 1266 underwent CR. No significant heterogeneity was identified across these selected studies. The CR strategy significantly decreased the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; odds ratio [OR]: 2.44, 95% CI [95% confidence interval]: 1.96-3.03, p < 0.001), mortality (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.25-2.47, p = 0.001), myocardial infarction (MI, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.12-2.35, p = 0.01), and repeat revascularization (OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 2.41-4.24, p < 0.001) compared with the COR approach. Moreover, no significant difference was identified in the safety indexes, including contrast-induced nephropathy, stroke, and bleeding, between the CR and the COR group (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
The present meta-analysis determined that CR is an efficacious and safe reperfusion strategy in patients with acute STEMI and multivessel disease.
More Related Videos
04:34Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Optimal Foraging
Optimization Problems
Persuasion Strategies
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
meta-Directing Deactivators: –NO2, –CN, –CHO, –⁠CO2R, –COR, –CO2H