Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Landscape of Living Multiorgan Donation in the United States: A Registry-Based Cohort Study
Macey L Henderson1,2, Sandra R DiBrito1, Alvin G Thomas1
1Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Insights
Living donors giving multiple organs is rare. Recipients of multiple organs from a single living donor showed similar survival rates to those receiving single organs, highlighting the safety of this practice.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation research
- Organ donation studies
- Surgical outcomes analysis
Background:
- Donation of multiple allografts from a single living donor is uncommon.
- Patient characteristics and outcomes for multiorgan living donation are not well-documented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe patient characteristics and outcomes for living multiorgan donors and recipients.
- To compare outcomes of multiorgan donation with single-organ donation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database.
- Identified 101 living multiorgan donors and 133 recipients.
- Analyzed outcomes for sequential and simultaneous multiorgan donations.
Main Results:
- 101 living multiorgan donors provided 133 grafts to recipients.
- Sequential donors (n=49) provided grafts in separate procedures; simultaneous donors (n=52) donated during a single procedure.
- Recipients from second-time living donors demonstrated similar graft and patient survival compared to recipients from first-time living donors for both kidney and liver transplants.
Conclusions:
- Outcomes for recipients of multiple organs from a single living donor are comparable to those receiving single organs.
- Further documentation of outcomes is crucial for ethical donor selection, informed consent, and postdonation care.
- This study contributes to understanding the safety and efficacy of living multiorgan donation.
Background:
The donation of multiple allografts from a single living donor is a rare practice, and the patient characteristics and outcomes associated with these procedures are not well described.
Methods:
Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 101 living multiorgan donors and their 133 recipients.
Results:
The 49 sequential (donations during separate procedures) multiorgan donors provided grafts to 81 recipients: 21 kidney-then-liver, 15 liver-then-kidney, 5 lung-then-kidney, 3 liver-then-intestine, 3 kidney-then-pancreas, 1 lung-then-liver, and 1 pancreas-then-kidney. Of these donors, 38% donated 2 grafts to the same recipient and 15% donated 2 grafts as non-directed donors. Compared to recipients from first-time, single organ living donors, recipients from second-time living donors had similar graft and patient survival. The 52 simultaneous (multiple donations during one procedure) multiorgan donors provided 2 grafts to 1 recipient each: 48 kidney-pancreas and 4 liver-intestine. Donors had median of 13.4 years (interquartile range, 8.3-18.5 years) of follow-up. There was one reported death of a sequential donor (2.5 years after second donation). Few postdonation complications were reported over a median of 116 days (interquartile range, 0-295 days) of follow-up; however, routine living donor follow-up data were sparse. Recipients of kidneys from second-time living donors had similar graft (P = 0.2) and patient survival (P = 0.4) when compared with recipients from first-time living donors. Similarly, recipients of livers from second-time living donors had similar graft survival (P = 0.9) and patient survival (P = 0.7) when compared with recipients from first-time living donors.
Conclusions:
Careful documentation of outcomes is needed to ensure ethical practices in selection, informed consent, and postdonation care of this unique donor community.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement: Derived Units
Measurement: Standard Units
Units of Measurement
There are various well-known historical measurement systems, such as the Babylonian system, the Roman system, the Egyptian system, the Olympian system, the British system, and the Indus...
International System of Units
Prefixes are used to define both larger and smaller quantities in the SI system. For example, milli, micro, and nano define smaller quantities, while kilo, mega, and giga are used to define...
Motor Units
Motor Units
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...

