Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Growth of suppression in the cochlear potentials.

M A Cheatham

    Hearing Research
    |June 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Suppression affects cochlear microphonic (CM) and summating potential (SP) differently. SP decreases faster than CM, suggesting a mechanical origin for suppression in the cochlea.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Comment on "Mutual suppression in the 6 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 2805-2818 (2007)].

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2008
    Same author

    Evaluation of an independent prestin mouse model derived from the 129S1 strain.

    Audiology & neuro-otology·2007
    Same author

    Cochlear function in mice with only one copy of the prestin gene.

    The Journal of physiology·2005
    Same author

    Cochlear function in Prestin knockout mice.

    The Journal of physiology·2004
    Same author

    Inner hair cell response patterns: implications for low-frequency hearing.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
    Same author

    Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy.

    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory Neuroscience
    • Otoacoustic Emissions
    • Sensory Physiology

    Background:

    • Two-tone suppression is a key phenomenon in auditory processing.
    • Understanding the mechanisms of suppression is crucial for diagnosing hearing loss.
    • Previous studies suggest varying impacts of suppression on different cochlear potentials.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the differential effects of two-tone suppression on cochlear microphonic (CM) and summating potential (SP).
    • To determine the growth rates of suppression for CM and SP.
    • To evaluate the implications of these findings for the origin of suppression.

    Main Methods:

    • Electrophysiological recordings in the cochlea.
    • Application of two-tone stimulation paradigms.
    • Analysis of CM and SP responses to varying suppressor levels.

    Main Results:

    • CM response to the fundamental decreased by 10 dB for every 10 dB increase in suppressor level.
    • SP decreased at a faster rate, approximately 20 dB per 10 dB increase in suppressor level.
    • CM response slopes for the second harmonic mirrored those for the DC component.

    Conclusions:

    • The distinct suppression growth rates for CM and SP suggest different underlying mechanisms.
    • Results support the hypothesis that suppression acts by attenuating the input to the CM generator.
    • Findings are consistent with a mechanical origin of two-tone suppression in the cochlea.

    Related Experiment Videos