[Treatment of postoperative macular edema (a clinical case study)]
I E Ioshin1, A I Tolchinskaya1, A M Bagirov1
1Clinical Hospital of the Presidential Administration, 45 Losinoostrovskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107143.
Abstract:
Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CMO) known to appear in 0.1-2.35% of patients after phacoemulsification is one of the common causes of vision decrease during postoperative period. The authors analyzed a case of CMO development in a pseudophakic patient diagnosed 7 months after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was suggested for patients with low vision and a sensation of shroud before the eye for early diagnosis of pathological process. Intravitreal injection of the 0.7 mg dexamethasone micro-implant performed soon after establishing the diagnosis was proved to be viable for postoperative CMO arrest in patients without previous treatment. One month after intravitreal implant injection, the visual acuity in the patient's eye improved from 0.4 to 0.7, and retinal thickness in the macular area decreased from 705 to 255 μm. The result remained stable for 10 months. Intravitreal micro-implant appeared to have higher efficiency in contrast with traditional treatment methods (according to literature data), which was attributed to direct drug delivery to the area of pathological process. The use of 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant did not increase the intraocular pressure indicating its potential viability for patients with compensated glaucoma.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.


