Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inflammatory Response II: Inflammatory Exudate and Tissue Repair01:24

Inflammatory Response II: Inflammatory Exudate and Tissue Repair

8.0K
The immune system's inflammatory response destroys the invading pathogen, permitting the tissue to heal. The changes during the cellular and vascular stages allow exudate formation at the site of inflammation. The inflammatory exudate released from the wound has high protein content and a specific gravity above 1.020.
The typical wound exudate is odorless, transparent, straw-colored, thin, and watery. Exudate, however, can differ depending on the state of wound healing. Likewise, the...
8.0K
Inflammatory Response01:28

Inflammatory Response

16.9K
An inflammatory response is a localized, nonspecific immune reaction that occurs when a tissue is injured. It is characterized by redness, swelling, heat, and pain, which are commonly called the cardinal signs and symptoms of inflammation. Inflammation can sometimes result in a loss of function.
Inflammation can be triggered by various stimuli, such as impact, abrasion, chemical irritation, infections, and extreme hot or cold temperatures. These can damage cells and connective tissue fibers,...
16.9K
Inflammatory Response I: Vascular and Cellular01:30

Inflammatory Response I: Vascular and Cellular

16.7K
The inflammatory response is the body's defense against infection, injury, or irritation from bacteria, trauma, toxins, or heat. Inflammation helps locate and destroy pathogens and remove damaged tissue elements to heal the body. During this initial phase, fluid, blood products, and nutrients migrate to the injured area, resulting in redness, heat, swelling, ache, and loss of function. Moreover, signs of systemic inflammation include fever, increased WBC count, malaise, anorexia, nausea,...
16.7K
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

673
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
673
Cell-surface Signaling01:21

Cell-surface Signaling

54.6K
Hormones—or any molecule that binds to a receptor, known as a ligand—that are lipid-insoluble (water-soluble) are not able to diffuse across the cell membrane. In order to be able to affect a cell without entering it, these hormones bind to receptors on the cell membrane. When a first messenger, a hormone, binds to a receptor, a signal cascade is set off, causing second messengers, proteins inside the cell, to become activated, resulting in downstream effects.
54.6K
Plant Cells and Tissues02:01

Plant Cells and Tissues

65.8K
Plant tissues are collections of similar cells performing related functions. Different plant tissues will have their own specialized roles and can be combined with other tissues to form organs such as flowers, fruit, stem, and leaves. Two major types of plant tissue include meristematic and permanent tissue.
65.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term effects of doping with anabolic steroids during adolescence on physical and mental health.

Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2024
Same author

MMP-9 mediated Syndecan-4 shedding correlates with osteoarthritis severity.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2020
Same author

Targeting β-catenin dependent Wnt signaling via peptidomimetic inhibitors in murine chondrocytes and OA cartilage.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2018
Same author

The effect of irrigation time and type of irrigation fluid on cartilage surface friction.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2017
Same author

Allergies in orthopaedic and trauma surgery.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2017
Same author

Articulating polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacers may have an immunomodulating effect on synovial tissue.

The bone & joint journal·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

A Standardized Method for Measuring Internal Lung Surface Area via Mouse Pneumonectomy and Prosthesis Implantation
08:46

A Standardized Method for Measuring Internal Lung Surface Area via Mouse Pneumonectomy and Prosthesis Implantation

Published on: July 26, 2017

14.0K

Ceramic prosthesis surfaces induce an inflammatory cell response and fibrotic tissue changes.

J Bertrand1, D Delfosse2, V Mai2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

The Bone & Joint Journal
|June 30, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study explored how ceramic-on-ceramic hip implants affect surrounding tissues. It found that these implants cause more fibrotic tissue changes than other implant types. The researchers compared tissue samples from ceramic-on-ceramic, metal-on-metal, and ceramic-on-polyethylene implants. They found that fibrosis increased with implantation time in all cases, but was most severe with ceramic-on-ceramic. The study also showed that fibroblasts and immune cells responded more strongly to one type of ceramic surface than another. These findings suggest that ceramic-on-ceramic implants may lead to long-term tissue changes due to ongoing inflammation. The results help explain why some patients experience fibrotic reactions after receiving these implants.

Keywords:
CeramicsFibrosisHip arthroplastyInflammationWear debriship implant fibrosisperiprosthetic inflammationceramic implant biologytissue response to implants

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Development of an Ethanol-induced Fibrotic Liver Model in Zebrafish to Study Progenitor Cell-mediated Hepatocyte Regeneration
10:42

Development of an Ethanol-induced Fibrotic Liver Model in Zebrafish to Study Progenitor Cell-mediated Hepatocyte Regeneration

Published on: May 13, 2016

9.6K
Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)
08:29

Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)

Published on: January 7, 2019

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

A Standardized Method for Measuring Internal Lung Surface Area via Mouse Pneumonectomy and Prosthesis Implantation
08:46

A Standardized Method for Measuring Internal Lung Surface Area via Mouse Pneumonectomy and Prosthesis Implantation

Published on: July 26, 2017

14.0K
Development of an Ethanol-induced Fibrotic Liver Model in Zebrafish to Study Progenitor Cell-mediated Hepatocyte Regeneration
10:42

Development of an Ethanol-induced Fibrotic Liver Model in Zebrafish to Study Progenitor Cell-mediated Hepatocyte Regeneration

Published on: May 13, 2016

9.6K
Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)
08:29

Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)

Published on: January 7, 2019

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic implant biology
  • Inflammatory response mechanisms
  • Tissue engineering in prosthetics

Background:

Prior research has shown that different implant materials elicit distinct tissue reactions. Established knowledge includes the role of wear particles in periprosthetic inflammation, particularly in metal-on-metal and polyethylene implants. However, less is known about ceramic-on-ceramic articulations and their specific biological effects. This gap motivated a closer examination of how ceramic surfaces interact with surrounding tissues. No prior work had resolved whether ceramic-on-ceramic implants provoke unique inflammatory or fibrotic responses. The need to compare ceramic-on-ceramic with other bearing types remains unmet in current literature. This uncertainty drove the investigation into cellular and tissue-level effects of ceramic prostheses. The study aimed to clarify whether ceramic-on-ceramic implants lead to distinct fibrotic changes compared to other implant types.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to investigate the tissue and cellular responses to ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) materials. It focused on comparing these responses with those from metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-polyethylene implants. The specific problem addressed was the lack of understanding about how ceramic-on-ceramic articulations affect periprosthetic tissues. The motivation stemmed from emerging evidence suggesting ceramic-on-ceramic implants may provoke unique biological reactions. The study sought to determine whether fibrotic changes are more pronounced with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. It also aimed to evaluate the inflammatory potential of different ceramic surfaces. The goal was to provide insights into the biological mechanisms behind observed tissue changes. This could help improve implant design and patient outcomes in the future.

Main Methods:

The study used tissue samples collected during revision surgeries from nine ceramic-on-ceramic THAs. These were compared with tissue from five metal-on-metal and four ceramic-on-polyethylene implants. Synovial membranes from four primary osteoarthritis cases served as controls. Tissue fibrosis was assessed using histological analysis. Fibroblast and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cultures were conducted on two ceramic types: ATZ and ZTA. The inflammatory response was measured through cytokine expression. The study also evaluated implantation time's effect on fibrosis levels. The comparison of ceramic types allowed for differentiation in biological responses. This approach enabled a detailed analysis of how ceramic surfaces influence cellular behavior.

Main Results:

Tissue fibrosis increased significantly with implantation time across all implant types. Ceramic-on-ceramic implants showed higher fibrosis levels than metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-polyethylene. Fibroblasts cultured on ATZ surfaces exhibited stronger cytokine responses than those on ZTA. PBMCs also showed a more pronounced inflammatory reaction to ATZ ceramics. The presence of ceramic wear particles in periprosthetic tissues was confirmed. Fibrotic changes were more severe in ceramic-on-ceramic cases. The inflammatory response of fibroblasts and PBMCs was linked to ceramic surface composition. These findings partially explain the observed fibrotic tissue changes in ceramic-on-ceramic implants.

Conclusions:

The authors concluded that ceramic-on-ceramic implants provoke distinct fibrotic tissue changes. Their findings suggest that these changes are linked to inflammatory responses from fibroblasts and PBMCs. The study showed that fibrosis increases with implantation time in all implant types. However, ceramic-on-ceramic implants exhibited significantly higher fibrosis than other types. The inflammatory response was more pronounced on ATZ ceramics compared to ZTA. This may explain the observed fibrotic changes in periprosthetic tissues. The presence of ceramic wear particles supports the inflammatory mechanism. The results corroborate prior observations about fibrotic tissue in ceramic-on-ceramic implants.

The study found that ceramic-on-ceramic implants induce higher fibrotic tissue changes compared to other implant types.

Tissue samples from nine ceramic-on-ceramic, five metal-on-metal, and four ceramic-on-polyethylene implants were analyzed for fibrosis and inflammatory markers.

This control group helped assess baseline fibrosis levels unrelated to implantation, ensuring accurate comparisons.

ATZ ceramics induced stronger fibroblast and PBMC inflammatory responses than ZTA ceramics, suggesting surface composition affects tissue reactions.

Histological analysis of tissue samples collected during revision surgeries was used to assess fibrosis levels.

The study suggests that these implants may lead to persistent fibrotic changes due to ongoing inflammatory responses from fibroblasts and PBMCs.