Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Using Synchrotron Radiation Microtomography to Investigate Multi-scale Three-dimensional Microelectronic Packages
Published on: April 13, 2016
3D high resolution imaging for microelectronics: A multi-technique survey on copper pillars
A Fraczkiewicz1, F Lorut2, G Audoit1
1Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble F-38000, France; CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, Grenoble F-38054, France.
3D integration in microelectronics requires advanced imaging. This study compares destructive and non-destructive 3D characterization techniques for copper pillars, finding lab-based methods suit spot checks and synchrotron imaging suits batch analysis.
Area of Science:
- Microelectronics
- Materials Science
- Advanced Imaging Techniques
Background:
- 3D integration in microelectronics enables vertical stacking of dice or wafers for space-saving.
- The increasing adoption of 3D integration necessitates the development and assessment of advanced 3D imaging techniques.
- Copper pillars are critical components for interconnecting stacked components in 3D integrated circuits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare various 3D characterization techniques for analyzing copper pillars used in microelectronic 3D integration.
- To assess both destructive and non-destructive imaging methods for their suitability in microelectronics applications.
- To provide insights into the resolution and sample throughput trade-offs of different 3D imaging modalities.
Main Methods:
- Destructive techniques: Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscopy (FIB/SEM), FIB/FIB, and Plasma Focused Ion Beam/Plasma Focused Ion Beam (PFIB/PFIB) slice-and-view protocols.
- Non-destructive techniques: Laboratory-based computed tomography (CT) and synchrotron-based computed tomography.
- Comparative analysis focusing on resolution, throughput, and applicability to copper pillar characterization.
Main Results:
- Destructive techniques like FIB/SEM and PFIB/PFIB offer high-resolution cross-sectional views but are time-consuming and sample-destructive.
- Laboratory-based CT is suitable for rapid, punctual analysis of individual copper pillars.
- Synchrotron-based CT provides highly resolved 3D volumes, making it ideal for analyzing larger batches of samples efficiently.
Conclusions:
- The choice of 3D characterization technique for microelectronic copper pillars depends on specific industry needs, such as analysis scope and sample volume.
- Laboratory-based imaging is effective for targeted, single-sample investigations.
- Synchrotron-based computed tomography is the preferred method for high-throughput, detailed volumetric analysis of multiple samples in 3D integration research and development.
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Introduction to Surveying, Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveys
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Types of Surveys
Survey Safety
Data Collection by Survey

