Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Advancing Risk-Informed Decision Making in Managing Defense Nuclear Waste in the United States: Opportunities and
Michael R Greenberg1, George Apostolakis2, Timothy Fields3
1Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
The Department of Energy (DOE) faces challenges in managing environmental cleanup risks due to varying state-level priorities. This can lead to resources not always addressing the most significant public health and safety risks nationally.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Risk Assessment & Management
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- A 2014 spending bill mandated the Department of Energy (DOE) to evaluate its strategies for addressing environmental cleanup liabilities.
- DOE's remaining environmental cleanup responsibilities pose ongoing public health and safety risks.
- A committee was formed to assess the effectiveness of DOE's risk identification, programming, and execution processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the effectiveness of the Department of Energy's (DOE) methods for identifying, programming, and executing plans for environmental cleanup risks.
- To provide recommendations for DOE, federal agencies, Congress, states, and tribal nations regarding risk management.
- To identify disparities in risk management approaches and their impact on resource allocation.
Main Methods:
- A committee conducted a review of DOE's risk assessment and management processes.
- Risk assessment involved utilizing available data, expert experience, identifying data gaps, and incorporating stakeholder input.
- Risk management analysis focused on state-level variations in laws, priorities, land use, and technology.
Main Results:
- The committee identified two dozen issues and provided associated recommendations.
- A structured risk review process was described, enabling the ordering of risks based on available information.
- Significant variations exist in state-driven risk management, including differing laws, priorities, and policies, leading to marked cost differences.
- Resource allocation may not consistently align with the most prominent human health and safety risks from a national perspective.
Conclusions:
- State-level variations in environmental cleanup risk management create inconsistencies and impact resource allocation.
- DOE's risk management strategies need refinement to ensure national-level prioritization of public health and safety risks.
- Collaborative efforts among DOE, federal agencies, states, and tribal nations are crucial for effective environmental cleanup and risk mitigation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Nuclear Fusion
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...

