Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026
Use of the Operant Orofacial Pain Assessment Device OPAD to Measure Changes in Nociceptive Behavior
Published on: June 10, 2013
Comparison of orofacial thermal sensitivity assessed with simple devices and sophisticated equipment
M Ayranci1, M Koutris1, F Lobbezoo1
1Department of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
Simple thermal devices providing reliable data are needed to detect somatosensory disturbances in non-specialized clinical settings. Currently, evidence is lacking about their use. Therefore, the aim was to compare the assessment of perceived thermal sensitivity/pain in healthy humans with a state-of-the-art thermotester and with simple inexpensive customized thermal aluminium devices.
Methods:
Twenty healthy volunteers participated in the study. The infraorbital region and the tip of the tongue were tested with the Medoc Pathway thermotester and simple aluminium thermal devices, with temperatures varying between 5-50°C. A numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0-50-100 was used for rating the perceived thermal sensitivity/painfulness. A control experiment was performed with 10 of the participants to test the potential impact of temporal summation of thermal stimuli with the use of temperature ramps (Medoc) compared with static temperature (simple devices).
Results:
In the original experiment, the scores from the thermotester stimulation were higher than the scores for stimulation with the simple thermal devices with mean NRS differences between devices of 7.2 and 10.2 for the two tested regions. In the control experiment, the mean NRS differences decreased to -0.3 and 2.2, respectively.
Conclusions:
Provided that temporal summation of the thermal stimuli was avoided, there were only minor differences in perceived thermal sensitivity/painfulness between the two different assessment methods at both test sites. Therefore, the simple thermal devices can be useful for assessment of thermal sensitivity in clinical settings without access to expensive sophisticated equipment. However, more sophisticated equipment is needed for threshold measurements.
Significance:
This study indicates that simple thermal devices to some extent can be used in a comparable way with sophisticated thermal stimulators. Therefore, they can be useful in clinical practice, where access to further equipment is lacking.
Related Concept Videos
01:18Leveling Equipment
02:57The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
01:20Personal Protective Equipment
01:27Thermal expansion and Thermal stress: Problem Solving
To solve the problem, first, identify the known and unknown quantities. The initial length (L) of the bridge is 1275 m, the coefficient of linear expansion (α) for steel is 12 x 10-6/°C, and the change in temperature (ΔT) is 55...
01:13Equipments Used to Measure Body Temperature
Glass-bulb Thermometer:
Glass-bulb thermometers are hollow glass tubes with a bulb tip containing liquid such as ethanol or mercury. Historically, glass bulb mercury thermometers were the standard device to measure body temperature. Today, mercury thermometers are prohibited in many countries due to the hazardous effects of mercury and the risk of exposure if the glass bulb breaks. In general,...
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...