Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding continuity effects with complex stimuli.

W R Thurlow1, W P Erchul

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

Journal of the American Auditory Society
|November 1, 1978
PubMed
Summary

The continuity effect demonstrates that a low-intensity stimulus is perceived as continuous when alternated with a high-intensity stimulus. This auditory phenomenon challenges simple substitution models, suggesting more complex neural processing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auditory continuity effects with binaural stimuli.

Perception & psychophysics·1987
Same author

Some comparisons of characteristics of alphabetic codes for the deaf-blind.

Human factors·1986
Same author

Studies on hand-held visual communication device for the deaf and speech-impaired I. Visual display window size.

Ear and hearing·1980
Same author

Studies on hand-held visual communication device for the deaf and speech-impaired 2. Keyboard design.

Ear and hearing·1980
Same author

Head tip, cue to object elevation and location: implications for the blind.

Perceptual and motor skills·1980
Same author

Auditory mechanisms.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1978

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The continuity effect describes the perception of a continuous auditory stimulus when it is briefly interrupted by a more intense sound.
  • Previous models often relied on simple stimulus substitution to explain this phenomenon.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the robustness of the continuity effect under varying stimulus conditions.
  • To challenge existing simple substitution models of auditory continuity.
  • To propose a new model for understanding auditory continuity effects.

Main Methods:

  • Alternating low-intensity stimulus A with high-intensity stimulus B.
  • Utilizing series of pulses at different rates for both stimuli A and B.
  • Analyzing the resulting neural temporal patterns.

Main Results:

  • The continuity effect persists even with complex, asynchronous pulse patterns for stimuli A and B.
  • This indicates that simple temporal substitution is insufficient to explain the observed continuity.
  • The study demonstrates the inadequacy of basic substitution models.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory continuity is not solely based on simple temporal pattern matching.
  • A more sophisticated neural model is required to account for the observed continuity effect.
  • The proposed model offers a better framework for understanding various auditory continuity phenomena.

Related Experiment Videos