Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Generating a "Humanized" Drosophila S2 Cell Line Sensitive to Pharmacological Inhibition of Kinesin-5
Published on: January 20, 2016
Predissociation of the B Σu-3 state of S2: A coupled-channel model
B R Lewis1, S T Gibson1, G Stark2
1Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Abstract:
A coupled-channel Schrödinger equation model of predissociation in the B Σu-3 state of S2 is developed and optimized by comparison with recent photoabsorption spectra of the B Σu-3-X Σg-3(v,0) bands for 11 ≤ v ≤ 27, covering the energy range 35 800-41 500 cm-1. All bands in this range exhibit varying degrees of diffuseness, with corresponding predissociation linewidths Γ ≈ 4-60 cm-1 full-width at half-maximum. Model comparisons with both low-temperature (T = 370 K) and high-temperature (T = 823 K) spectra indicate, for many bands, significant dependence of the linewidth on both the rotational quantum number J and the fine-structure component Fi. Just as in the analogous case of O2, the B(v)-state predissociation in S2 is caused principally by spin-orbit interaction with 3Πu, 1Πu, 5Πu, and Σu+3 states. The inner-limb crossing with B″3Πu is responsible for the predissociation of B(v = 11) and provides a significant slowly varying contribution for B(v ≥ 12). The outer crossings with the 1Πu, 5Πu, and 2 Σu+3 states are responsible for oscillatory contributions to the predissociation widths, with first peaks at v = 13, 20, and 24, respectively, and the 5Πu contribution dominant. Prior to the photodissociation imaging study of Frederix et al. [J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 14995 (2009)], which redefined the dissociation energy of S2, the prevailing paradigm was that only the 1Πu interaction was responsible for the B(v = 11-16) predissociation: this view is not supported by our model.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ion Channels
Ion channels are specialized integral membrane proteins on the plasma membrane that allow...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Couple
A typical example to understand this concept is tightening a bolt with a lug wrench. A...

