Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.3K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy01:37

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

14.6K
Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been...
14.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ontogenetic variation in Milos viper (Macrovipera schweizeri) venom composition and biochemical activity.

Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP·2026
Same author

Evaluating stroke recognition and prehospital quality metrics in emergency dispatch: a retrospective cohort study comparing mimics and confirmed strokes.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Spectral CTA-based quantitative differentiation of infarcted and non-infarcted ASPECTS regions in acute stroke.

European radiology experimental·2026
Same author

CT-Based Thymic Morphology as an Imaging Surrogate of Immune Ageing and Its Association with Coronary Artery Calcification-A Hypothesis-Generating Observational Study.

Biomedicines·2026
Same author

Evaluating flow modulating treatment response in intracranial aneurysms using black-blood MRI in vitro.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in Alzheimer's disease: from pathophysiology to individualized risk assessment.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
12:29

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling

Published on: May 30, 2011

14.2K

Optimized super-selective Arterial Spin Labeling for quantitative flow territory mapping.

Thomas Lindner1, Olav Jansen1, Michael Helle2

  • 1University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, 24103 Kiel, Germany.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|July 4, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Measuring labeling efficiency in super-selective Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) is crucial for accurate brain perfusion quantification. This study demonstrates that accounting for labeling efficiency ensures reliable cerebral blood flow measurements, even with slight shifts in the labeling focus.

Keywords:
Arterial Spin LabelingPhase-contrastQuantificationSuper-selective

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Noninvasive Cerebral Blood Flow Determination in Human Functional Brain Region for Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
05:23

Author Spotlight: Noninvasive Cerebral Blood Flow Determination in Human Functional Brain Region for Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders

Published on: May 31, 2024

884
A Novel Method: Super-selective Adrenal Venous Sampling
06:08

A Novel Method: Super-selective Adrenal Venous Sampling

Published on: September 15, 2017

24.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
12:29

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling

Published on: May 30, 2011

14.2K
Author Spotlight: Noninvasive Cerebral Blood Flow Determination in Human Functional Brain Region for Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
05:23

Author Spotlight: Noninvasive Cerebral Blood Flow Determination in Human Functional Brain Region for Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders

Published on: May 31, 2024

884
A Novel Method: Super-selective Adrenal Venous Sampling
06:08

A Novel Method: Super-selective Adrenal Venous Sampling

Published on: September 15, 2017

24.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Medical Physics
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) provides insights into brain physiology, but relies on assumptions of labeling efficiency for perfusion calculations.
  • Inaccuracies can arise from these assumptions, particularly in super-selective ASL where precise arterial targeting is challenging.
  • Accurate measurement of labeling efficiency is vital for reliable ASL-derived brain perfusion data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an optimized super-selective ASL tagging scheme.
  • To measure and evaluate the labeling efficiency of this super-selective ASL approach.
  • To assess the impact of labeling efficiency on cerebral blood flow quantification, especially when the labeling spot deviates from the target artery.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and implemented an optimized super-selective ASL tagging scheme.
  • Measured labeling efficiency using quantitative phase-contrast angiography of the tagged artery and flow territory volume.
  • Compared measured efficiencies with simulations and evaluated cerebral blood flow accuracy with shifted labeling foci.

Main Results:

  • The study presents an optimized super-selective ASL method with measured labeling efficiencies.
  • Cerebral blood flow quantification remained accurate despite shifts in the labeling focus (up to 3 mm), provided labeling efficiency was considered.
  • Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was expectedly lower with focus shifts but did not compromise accuracy when efficiency was accounted for.

Conclusions:

  • Measuring labeling efficiency is essential for accurate super-selective ASL perfusion quantification.
  • Accounting for measured labeling efficiency prevents false results and ensures reliable cerebral blood flow values.
  • The optimized super-selective ASL approach demonstrates robustness in maintaining accuracy even with minor positional deviations.