Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System
Published on: November 22, 2016
Ingested engineered nanomaterials: state of science in nanotoxicity testing and future research needs
Ikjot Singh Sohal1, Kevin S O'Fallon2, Peter Gaines3
1Biomedical Engineering & Biotechnology Program, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA. IkjotSingh_Sohal@student.uml.edu.
Safety assessments of ingested engineered nanomaterials (iENM) in food are crucial. Current in vitro models often lack realistic dosimetry and characterization, highlighting the need for improved testing strategies for iENM safety.
Area of Science:
- Nanotoxicology
- Food Science
- Materials Science
Background:
- Engineered nanomaterials (ENM) are increasingly used in food for various functions, including texture enhancement, nutritional fortification, and improved packaging.
- Safety assessment of ingested ENM (iENM) is a growing concern within the nanotoxicology field.
- In vitro monoculture cell models are commonly used for iENM safety evaluations due to cost and ease of use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the current state of toxicological testing for iENM.
- To assess the physiological relevance, methodological strengths, and challenges of existing test systems.
- To identify future research needs and priorities for iENM safety assessment.
Main Methods:
- Conducted extensive literature searches in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science for studies on iENM safety over the last decade.
- Evaluated relevant literature based on criteria including material characterization, dispersion, dosimetry, dose realism, dissolution, and endpoints.
- Analyzed data to identify patterns, trends, and research gaps in iENM toxicity testing.
Main Results:
- Only 21% of reviewed studies used food-grade nanomaterials, and 53% provided adequate physicochemical characterization.
- All in vitro studies lacked proper dosimetry, and 60% did not justify tested doses.
- Few studies considered nanomaterial dissolution kinetics (12%) or prepared standardized dispersions (1 study).
Conclusions:
- Key factors for robust iENM toxicology include using food-grade materials, comprehensive characterization, standardized dispersions, realistic dosimetry, and assessing dissolution/biotransformation.
- Current in vitro models often lack the physiological relevance needed for accurate iENM safety assessment.
- Recommendations are provided to guide future iENM toxicity studies and develop more representative in vitro models.
Related Concept Videos
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Physiology of the Gastrointestinal System I: Ingestion and Propulsion
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences
What is Genetic Engineering?
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)
SPSS streamlines the process from data preparation to analysis and reporting. It is characterized by its user-friendly interface, which conceals...
Heat Engines
Whenever we consider heat engines (and associated devices such as refrigerators and heat pumps), we do not use the standard sign convention for heat and work. For convenience, we assume that the symbols Qh, Qc, and W represent only the amounts of heat transferred...

