Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Neutrophil Isolation and Analysis to Determine their Role in Lymphoma Cell Sensitivity to Therapeutic Agents
Published on: March 25, 2016
Differential prognostic impact of GELTAMO-IPI in cell of origin subtypes of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma as defined
Carlos Montalbán1, Antonio Díaz-López2, Alejandro Martín3
1Department of Haematology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.
Insights
The Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplantes de Médula Ósea International Prognostic Index (GELTAMO-IPI) impacts diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survival differently based on cell of origin (COO) subtypes. GELTAMO-IPI identifies a poor prognosis group within the non-GCB subtype.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Immunology
Background:
- Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
- The Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplantes de Médula Ósea International Prognostic Index (GELTAMO-IPI) stratifies DLBCL patients into four risk groups.
- DLBCL can be classified into Germinal Centre B (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes based on cell of origin (COO).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the differential impact of GELTAMO-IPI risk groups on survival across DLBCL subtypes (GCB vs. non-GCB).
- To evaluate the interaction between GELTAMO-IPI and COO subtypes in predicting patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A multivariate Cox regression model was employed.
- The model included GELTAMO-IPI risk groups, COO subtypes (GCB/non-GCB), and their interaction term.
- Analysis was performed on a cohort of 780 DLBCL patients with available GELTAMO-IPI and COO data.
Main Results:
- A significant interaction (P=0.005) was observed between GELTAMO-IPI risk groups and COO subtypes.
- In the GCB subtype, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 100% (LR), 75% (LIR), and 52% (HIR+HR).
- In the non-GCB subtype, 5-year OS was 97% (LR), 82% (LIR+HIR), and 35% (HR), identifying a poor prognosis group.
Conclusions:
- GELTAMO-IPI has a differential prognostic value in GCB and non-GCB DLBCL subtypes.
- The GELTAMO-IPI effectively identifies a high-risk group with poor outcomes specifically within the non-GCB DLBCL subtype.
- This highlights the importance of considering both prognostic indices and COO in DLBCL patient management.
Abstract:
The Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplantes de Médula Ósea International Prognostic Index (GELTAMO-IPI) stratifies four risk groups in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with immunochaemotherapy: low (LR), low-intermediate (LIR), high-intermediate (HIR), and high (HR). The present study explores the effect of GELTAMO-IPI in the DLBCL subtypes defined by the immunohistochaemistry-based Hans algorithm, Germinal Centre B (GCB) and non-GCB. A multivariate Cox regression model including GELTAMO-IPI risk groups, cell of origin (COO) subtypes and their product was developed to evaluate interaction between the two variables. The COO subtype was available in 839 patients (380 GCB; 459 non-GCB) and both the GELTAMO-IPI and the COO subtype in 780 (353 GCB; 427 non-GCB). There were no differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) between the two subtypes. The Cox model revealed interaction between the GELTAMO-IPI risk groups and the COO subtypes (P = 0·005), indicating that GELTAMO-IPI has a different effect in the two subtypes. Three risk groups were stratified in both COO subtypes: in the GCB subtype, LR, LIR and the combined HIR+HR had 5-year OS of 100%, 75% and 52%, respectively. In the non-GCB subtype, LR, the combined LIR+HIR and HR had a 5-year OS of, 97%, 82% and 35% respectively. GELTAMO-IPI identifies a genuine poor outcome group of patients in the DLBCL non-GCB subtype.
Related Concept Videos
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
iPS Cell Differentiation
B Cell Activation and Differentiation
When naive B cells encounter a specific antigen that can bind to the B cell receptor (BCR) on their surface, they undergo sensitization to respond to the antigen's presence. Sensitization begins with...
Diffusion
Diffusion
Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells

