Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Malpractice risk at the physician level: Claim-prone physicians
E L Gómez-Durán1, C Martin-Fumadó1, J Benet-Travé2
1Professional Liability Department, Barcelona's College of Physicians, Barcelona, Spain; Medicine Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract:
Professional liability and patient safety are worldwide concerns and efforts to identify claimed physicians' characteristics cross borders. Interventions with "at risk populations" would help to better address the underlying problems that lead to many claims. We analyzed physicians' characteristics of every paid claim between 2005 and 2014 in Catalonia region (Spain). We identified 808 physicians involved in 725 paid claims. A total of 12.38% physicians had at least two paid claims over the study period. Physicians' risk of future paid claims was increased if they had more than one previous paid claim (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67-2,1). More than half the claims were accounted for by physicians in four specialty groups: obstetrics and gynecology (20.4%), traumatology and orthopedic Surgery (17.5%), plastic surgery (10%) and general surgery (9.7%). The risk of recurrence was higher among surgery-related specialties than among non-surgery-related specialties. Specialty is a particularly strong determinant of claim incidence, so the risk issue may not be so individually determined, but conditioned by the kind of medicine or procedures we practice. Nevertheless, physicians' risk of future paid-claims increases after the second claim. Management systems should take advantage of this information, in order to prevent patient safety events and malpractice claims. Our results support both specialty-based interventions in high-risk specialties, such us Plastic Surgery, as well as interventions at a physician level in those physicians with more than one paid claim.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Relative Risk
Leveling Effect

