Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD01:11

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD

3.3K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
3.3K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.0K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.0K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

3.0K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
3.0K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

6.3K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
6.3K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.2K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K
Leveling Effect01:29

Leveling Effect

1.4K
In acid-base chemistry, the leveling effect refers to the limitation imposed by the solvent on the strength of acids and bases in solution. When a base stronger than the solvent's conjugate base is used, it deprotonates the solvent until the base is entirely consumed, making it ineffective against weaker acids. Conversely, an acid stronger than the solvent's conjugate acid protonates the solvent until the acid is depleted, rendering it ineffective against weaker bases. Essentially, the...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What do men know about prostate cancer?

Actas urologicas espanolas·2025
Same author

Informed consent in urology.

Actas urologicas espanolas·2024
Same author

Learning from error in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology.

Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia·2022
Same author

Learning from error in Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology.

Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia·2022
Same author

Healthcare professionals diagnosed by COVID-19 at work: The right for it to be classified as an occupational disease.

Revista clinica espanola·2022
Same author

Management of testicular torsion in the ER: lessons learned from medical professional liability claims.

Actas urologicas espanolas·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

88.0K

Malpractice risk at the physician level: Claim-prone physicians.

E L Gómez-Durán1, C Martin-Fumadó1, J Benet-Travé2

  • 1Professional Liability Department, Barcelona's College of Physicians, Barcelona, Spain; Medicine Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
|July 8, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Physician characteristics and specialty impact malpractice claims. High-risk specialties like obstetrics and surgery have more claims, and physicians with prior claims face increased future risk.

Keywords:
ClaimsMalpracticeMedical errorsPatient safetyProfessional liabilityQuality improvement

More Related Videos

An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
07:16

An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient

Published on: November 30, 2022

4.8K
Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table
04:57

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table

Published on: July 3, 2025

922

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

88.0K
An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
07:16

An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient

Published on: November 30, 2022

4.8K
Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table
04:57

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table

Published on: July 3, 2025

922

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Patient Safety
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Professional liability and patient safety are global concerns.
  • Identifying physician characteristics associated with malpractice claims is crucial for targeted interventions.
  • Previous claims can indicate physicians at higher risk for future malpractice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze physician characteristics and specialties linked to paid malpractice claims.
  • To identify factors increasing the risk of recurrent paid claims.
  • To inform interventions for preventing patient safety events and malpractice.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of paid malpractice claims data from physicians in Catalonia, Spain (2005-2014).
  • Inclusion of 808 physicians involved in 725 paid claims.
  • Statistical analysis to determine factors associated with claim incidence and recurrence.

Main Results:

  • 12.38% of physicians had at least two paid claims between 2005 and 2014.
  • Physicians with one previous claim had a 1.87 times higher risk of future claims.
  • Obstetrics/gynecology (20.4%), traumatology/orthopedic surgery (17.5%), plastic surgery (10%), and general surgery (9.7%) accounted for over half of claims.
  • Surgery-related specialties showed a higher risk of claim recurrence.

Conclusions:

  • Specialty is a significant determinant of malpractice claim incidence.
  • Physicians with multiple prior claims face an elevated risk of future claims.
  • Interventions should target high-risk specialties and physicians with a history of claims to improve patient safety and reduce malpractice.