Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.2K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.2K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

35.7K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgical site infection surveillance in Australian public and private hospitals: a comparative analysis.

Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association·2025
Same author

Defining the scope of point-of-care ultrasound in internal medicine: a consensus statement by the point-of-care special interest group of the Internal Medicine Society of Australia and New Zealand.

Internal medicine journal·2025
Same author

Prospective international validation of the predisposition, infection, response and organ dysfunction (PIRO) clinical staging system among intensive care and general ward patients.

Annals of intensive care·2021
Same author

Can the alcohol withdrawal scale be applied to post-operative patients?

ANZ journal of surgery·2021
Same author

Junior doctor training: has the pendulum swung too far?

Internal medicine journal·2019
Same journal

The paradox of peer review: protecting science or policing thought?

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Immune-related pancytopenia in pregnancy.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Crossover effect: causal machine learning reveals opposing mortality responses to mean arterial pressure targets among phenotypically distinct hypertensive patients with septic shock.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Clinicopathological findings, correlations and outcomes in patients with renal disease and living with antiretroviral-treated human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Approach to thyroid disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of specialist hypertension clinics.

Internal medicine journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K

What makes a good doctor?

Ronan O'Donnabhain1,2, N Deborah Friedman2,3

  • 1Department of General Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Internal Medicine Journal
|July 10, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Defining a good doctor varies by perspective. Patients prioritize communication and shared decision-making, while hospital leaders focus on operational efficiency and performance metrics.

Keywords:
compassioncompetenceempathygood doctor

More Related Videos

Establishment of a Chilli Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) Rearing System for Virulence Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi
11:35

Establishment of a Chilli Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) Rearing System for Virulence Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi

Published on: July 18, 2025

930
Characterization of Electrode Materials for Lithium Ion and Sodium Ion Batteries Using Synchrotron Radiation Techniques
10:03

Characterization of Electrode Materials for Lithium Ion and Sodium Ion Batteries Using Synchrotron Radiation Techniques

Published on: November 11, 2013

26.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K
Establishment of a Chilli Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) Rearing System for Virulence Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi
11:35

Establishment of a Chilli Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) Rearing System for Virulence Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi

Published on: July 18, 2025

930
Characterization of Electrode Materials for Lithium Ion and Sodium Ion Batteries Using Synchrotron Radiation Techniques
10:03

Characterization of Electrode Materials for Lithium Ion and Sodium Ion Batteries Using Synchrotron Radiation Techniques

Published on: November 11, 2013

26.1K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Patient Experience
  • Medical Professionalism

Background:

  • Defining physician quality is complex and multifaceted.
  • Perspectives on physician effectiveness differ significantly between patients and hospital administrators.
  • Patient-centered care emphasizes interpersonal skills and shared decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the divergent perspectives on what constitutes a "good doctor" from patient and hospital executive viewpoints.
  • To identify key performance indicators (KPIs) valued by hospital executives versus interpersonal qualities valued by patients.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of stated priorities from patient groups and hospital executive interviews.
  • Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes and administrative performance data.

Main Results:

  • Patients highly value empathy, communication, and involvement in treatment decisions.
  • Hospital executives prioritize metrics such as patient throughput, adherence to protocols, and cost-efficiency.
  • A significant disconnect exists between patient-centric and system-centric definitions of physician quality.

Conclusions:

  • Reconciling patient expectations with hospital operational goals is crucial for holistic physician evaluation.
  • Future quality improvement initiatives should integrate both interpersonal and performance metrics.
  • Understanding these differing priorities can inform better healthcare delivery and professional development.