Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

A Repetitive Concussive Head Injury Model in Mice
Published on: October 12, 2016
Repetition-to-Repetition Differences Using Cluster and Accentuated Eccentric Loading in the Back Squat.
John P Wagle1, Christopher B Taber2, Kevin M Carroll3
1Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, Department of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA. johnwagle9@gmail.com.
Cluster sets help maintain concentric strength during back squats, while accentuated eccentric loading may increase eccentric force production. Neither method potentiated concentric output but cluster sets improved concentric performance.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Exercise Physiology
- Strength and Conditioning
Background:
- The back squat is a fundamental exercise in strength training.
- Understanding the effects of different loading strategies, such as accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) and cluster sets, is crucial for optimizing training outcomes.
- Previous research has explored these methods individually, but their combined effects on kinetic and kinematic characteristics require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the repetition-to-repetition changes in kinetic and kinematic variables during the back squat under four different loading conditions.
- To compare the effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) and cluster sets versus traditional loading (TL) on performance metrics.
- To determine if AEL potentiates concentric output and to assess the maintenance of concentric performance with cluster sets.
Main Methods:
- Trained male subjects performed back squats under four conditions: traditionally loaded straight sets (TL), traditionally loaded cluster sets (TLC), AEL cluster sets (AEC), and AEL straight sets (AEL1).
- Concentric load was set at 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM), while AEL involved an eccentric load of 105% 1RM using weight releasers.
- Kinetic and kinematic data, including peak power (PP), concentric rate of force development (RFDCON), average velocity (MV), and eccentric rate of force development (RFDECC), were analyzed across repetitions.
Main Results:
- Straight sets (TL and AEL1) tended to decrease PP, RFDCON, and MV. Cluster sets also showed moderate decreases in MV.
- Accentuated eccentric loading cluster sets (AEC) resulted in greater eccentric rate of force development (RFDECC) at repetitions three and five compared to all other conditions.
- AEL1 demonstrated a significant increase in RFDECC from repetition one to three, indicating sustained elevated eccentric force production despite initial overload.
Conclusions:
- Cluster sets appear to enhance the maintenance of concentric performance throughout a set during the back squat.
- The specific AEL protocol used did not potentiate concentric output but may increase eccentric force production compared to traditional loading.
- Combining AEL with cluster sets may offer benefits for eccentric force development, while cluster sets alone aid in maintaining concentric performance.
Related Concept Videos
Eccentric Loading
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
Design of Columns under an Eccentric Load
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections
Eccentricity of an Ellipse

