Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.7K

Compared performance of Spot and SW800 photoscreeners on Chinese children

Xuehan Qian1, Ying Li2, Gang Ding1

  • 1Department of Strabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.

The British Journal of Ophthalmology
|July 11, 2018
PubMed

Insights

The Spot and SW800 vision screeners effectively detect amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children, showing strong agreement with standard eye exams. Both devices offer satisfactory performance for early detection and intervention.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Optometry
  • Vision Screening Technology

Background:

  • Amblyopia, or 'lazy eye,' is a leading cause of vision impairment in children.
  • Early detection of amblyopia risk factors is crucial for timely intervention and preventing permanent vision loss.
  • Assessing the efficacy of modern vision screening tools is essential for improving pediatric eye care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the Spot photoscreener and SW800 vision screener.
  • To assess their ability to detect amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children aged 4-6 years.
  • To compare their performance against established ophthalmologic examination methods.

Main Methods:

  • 113 children (226 eyes) underwent comprehensive eye exams, including cycloplegic retinoscopy and prism cover tests.
  • Photoscreening was performed using both Spot and SW800 devices.
  • Agreement was assessed using paired t-tests and Pearson correlation; sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on AAPOS guidelines; ROC curves analyzed overall effectiveness.

Main Results:

  • Both Spot and SW800 showed strong linear agreement with retinoscopy for refractive error and horizontal deviation (p<0.01).
  • Spot demonstrated high sensitivity (94.0%) and specificity (80.0%), while SW800 showed 88.8% sensitivity and 81.1% specificity.
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated similar overall performance between the two screeners in detecting amblyopia risk factors.

Conclusions:

  • The Spot and SW800 photoscreeners demonstrate strong agreement with cycloplegic retinoscopy and prism cover tests.
  • Both devices provide satisfactory performance in identifying individual amblyopia risk factors.
  • The study concludes that Spot and SW800 are similarly effective for vision screening in this pediatric population.
Abstract

Keywords:
Child health (paediatrics)EpidemiologyVision

More Related Videos

Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos05:32

Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos

Published on: December 7, 2018

9.7K
Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS08:38

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS

Published on: November 8, 2015

17.5K

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.8K
Comparative Excretory Systems02:24

Comparative Excretory Systems

Animals have evolved different strategies for excretion, the removal of waste from the body. Most waste must be dissolved in water to be excreted, so an animal’s excretory strategy directly affects its water balance.
26.7K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.1K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
607
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
309
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
16.4K