Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Modeling Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Non-Hepatic 293T-NE-3NRs Cells
Published on: June 5, 2020
Transplanting Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Versus Uninfected Kidneys Into Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Recipients: A
Mark H Eckman1, E Steve Woodle1, Charuhas V Thakar1
1University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.).
Insights
Transplanting hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected kidneys into HCV-infected patients is more cost-effective and improves quality-adjusted life expectancy. This strategy offers significant cost savings and better outcomes for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Hepatology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Direct-acting antiviral agents are available for treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
- Kidney transplantation is a critical treatment option for patients with ESRD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the cost-effectiveness of transplanting HCV-infected versus HCV-uninfected kidneys into HCV-infected patients.
- To compare patient outcomes and healthcare costs associated with different kidney transplant strategies for HCV-infected ESRD patients.
Main Methods:
- A Markov state-transition decision model was utilized.
- Data were sourced from MEDLINE searches and bibliographies of relevant English-language articles.
- The analysis focused on HCV-infected patients with ESRD receiving hemodialysis in the United States over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare system perspective.
Main Results:
- Transplanting an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment was more effective and less costly than transplanting an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment.
- Patients gained an average of 0.50 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with a lifetime cost savings of $41,591.
- This strategy remained preferred in sensitivity analyses, unless the wait time for an uninfected kidney was less than 161 days.
Conclusions:
- Transplanting HCV-infected kidneys into HCV-infected patients increases quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduces costs.
- This approach is a more effective and economical strategy for managing HCV in ESRD patients requiring kidney transplantation.
- The study did not account for the benefit of reduced HCV transmission from treating infected patients.
Background:
Direct-acting antiviral agents are now available to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
Objective:
To examine whether it is more cost-effective to transplant HCV-infected or HCV-uninfected kidneys into HCV-infected patients.
Design:
Markov state-transition decision model.
Data Sources:
MEDLINE searches and bibliographies from relevant English-language articles.
Target Population:
HCV-infected patients with ESRD receiving hemodialysis in the United States.
Time Horizon:
Lifetime.
Perspective:
Health care system.
Intervention:
Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment versus transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment.
Outcome Measures:
Effectiveness, measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs, measured in 2017 U.S. dollars.
Results Of Base-Case Analysis:
Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment was more effective and less costly than transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment, largely because of longer wait times for uninfected kidneys. A typical 57.8-year-old patient receiving hemodialysis would gain an average of 0.50 QALY at a lifetime cost savings of $41 591.
Results Of Sensitivity Analysis:
Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment continued to be preferred in sensitivity analyses of many model parameters. Transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment was not preferred unless the additional wait time for an uninfected kidney was less than 161 days.
Limitation:
The study did not consider the benefit of decreased HCV transmission from treating HCV-infected patients.
Conclusion:
Transplanting HCV-infected kidneys into HCV-infected patients increased quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduced costs compared with transplanting HCV-uninfected kidneys into HCV-infected patients.
Primary Funding Source:
Merck Sharp & Dohme and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What are Viruses?
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Hepatic Portal System
At its core, the hepatic portal vein is the result of a confluence of the superior and inferior mesenteric veins along with the splenic vein. Each of these veins has a unique role. The superior mesenteric vein is...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Hepatic Drug Excretion: Influencing Factors
Hepatic Drug Clearance: Role of Transporters

