Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training
Published on: January 20, 2019
Balance- and Strength-Training Protocols to Improve Chronic Ankle Instability Deficits, Part II: Assessing
Emily A Hall1, Andrea K Chomistek2, Jackie J Kingma3
1Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Departments of.
Context:
Assessing global, regional, and fear-of-reinjury outcomes in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) is critical to understanding the effectiveness of clinical interventions.
Objective:
To determine the improvement of patient-reported outcomes after balance- and strength-training and control protocols among participants with CAI.
Design:
Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Setting:
Athletic training research laboratory.
Patients Or Other Participants:
Thirty-nine volunteers with CAI who scored 11 or greater on the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: balance-training protocol (7 males, 6 females; age = 23.5 ± 6.5 years, height = 175.0 ± 8.5 cm, mass = 72.8 ± 10.9 kg), strength-training protocol (8 males, 5 females; age = 24.6 ± 7.7 years, height = 173.2 ± 9.0 cm, mass = 76.0 ± 16.2 kg), or control (6 males, 7 females; age = 24.8 ± 9.0 years, height = 175.5 ± 8.4 cm, mass = 79.1 ± 16.8 kg).
Intervention(S):
Each group met for 20 minutes, 3 times each week, for 6 weeks. The control group completed a mild to moderately strenuous bicycle workout.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
Global patient-reported outcomes, regional ankle function, and perceived instability were measured using the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, and a visual analog scale for perceived instability. Participants completed the questionnaires at pretest and 6 weeks posttest. A multivariate repeated-measures analysis of variance with follow-up univariate analysis was conducted. The α level was set a priori at .05.
Results:
No time-by-group interaction was found ( P = .78, η2 = 0.09). However, we observed a main effect for time ( P = .001, η2 = 0.49). Follow-up univariate analyses revealed differences between the pretest and posttest for the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale ( P = .02, η2 = 0.15), Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire ( P = .001, η2 = 0.27), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Activities of Daily Living subscale ( P = .003, η2 = 0.22), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sport subscale ( P = .001, η2 = 0.36), and visual analog scale ( P = .008, η2 = 0.18).
Conclusions:
Statistically, after the 6-week intervention, all groups improved in global and regional health-related quality of life. Clinicians should compare patient-reported outcomes with clinical measures to have a better understanding of progression during rehabilitation.
More Related Videos
07:52Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
07:27Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty
Published on: October 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Ankle Joint
Data Reporting and Recording
Microtubule Instability
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Balancing Redox Equations
Acid Strength and Molecular Structure
In the absence of any leveling effect, the acid strength of binary compounds of hydrogen with nonmetals (A) increases as the H-A bond strength decreases down a group in the periodic table. For group 17, the order of increasing acidity is HF < HCl < HBr < HI. Likewise, for group 16, the order of increasing acid strength is H2O < H2S < H2Se < H2Te. Across a row in the periodic table, the acid strength of binary hydrogen compounds increases with increasing...