Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Highly Efficient Gene Disruption of Murine and Human Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells by CRISPR/Cas9
Published on: April 10, 2018
Microbial cell disruption methods for efficient release of enzyme L-asparaginase
Tales A Costa-Silva1, Juan Carlos Flores-Santos1, Rominne K B Freire1
1a Department of Pharmaceutical and Biochemical Technology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Mechanical cell disruption methods, particularly sonication, are most effective for releasing proteins and L-asparaginase enzyme from microbial sources like bacteria, yeast, and fungi. This study optimizes extraction for various microorganisms.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Microbiology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Efficient cell disruption is crucial for extracting intracellular enzymes like L-asparaginase.
- Various methods exist for microbial cell lysis, but their effectiveness varies across different microorganisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the efficacy of different laboratory-scale cell disruption methods for L-asparaginase extraction.
- To identify the optimal disruption procedure for specific microbial sources: Escherichia coli, Leucosporidium muscorum, and Aspergillus terreus.
Main Methods:
- Assessed cell disruption using glass bead stirring, sonication, osmotic shock, freezing/grinding, solvents, and detergents.
- Measured total protein release and L-asparaginase activity as indicators of disruption efficiency.
- Tested methods on Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3), Leucosporidium muscorum, and Aspergillus terreus (CCT 7693).
Main Results:
- Sonication and glass bead stirring were effective for filamentous fungi, with sonication yielding higher specific activity (4.61 IU/mg).
- Mechanical methods, especially sonication, were superior for yeast and bacteria, achieving higher total enzyme activity (7.3 IU for yeast, 61.7 IU for bacteria) and specific activity (9.01 IU/mg for bacteria).
- Mechanical methods generally proved most effective for all microbial cell types studied.
Conclusions:
- Mechanical cell disruption techniques, particularly sonication, are highly effective for extracting intracellular enzymes from diverse microbial sources.
- This study provides a comparative analysis of cell disruption methods for L-asparaginase extraction, applicable to other periplasmic enzyme extractions.
Related Concept Videos
Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth
Enzymes
Enzyme deficiencies can often translate into life-threatening diseases. For example, a genetic abnormality resulting in the deficiency of the enzyme G6PD...
Biological Methods for Microbial Control
Enzyme Kinetics
Scientists typically study enzyme kinetics with a fixed amount of enzyme in the controlled environment of a test tube. When more reactant, or substrate, is...
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

