Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Reproductive Techniques for Ovarian Monitoring and Control in Amphibians
Published on: May 12, 2019
Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology - a retrospective
Selcuk Selcuk1, Bulent Emre Bilgic2, Cetin Kilicci1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Introduction:
This study aims to compare the association between the most commonly used ovarian responsiveness markers - age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) - and ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropin stimulation in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles.
Material And Methods:
Patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment using either a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or agonist protocol were enrolled in the study. Data of the patients were abstracted from the hospital's database. Tests were compared for total number of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, embryos, good quality embryos on day 1 and day 3, and ongoing pregnancies per cycle.
Results:
The OSI was the ovarian response test that had the strongest relationship with the ART outcomes. The level of association between the ovarian response tests and poor ovarian response data was (in descending order): OSI, ORPI, AFC, AMH, and age (AUCOSI = 0.976, AUCORPI = 0.905, AUCAFC = 0.899, AUCAMH = 0.864, AUCage = 0.617). The overall association between OSI and poor ovarian response was significantly higher than the other parameters (p1 = 0.0023, p2 = 0.0014, p3 = 0.0001, p4 ≤ 0.0001). In patients with high ovarian response data, OSI had the highest association, followed by AFC and ORPI age (AUCOSI = 0.984, AUCAFC = 0.907, AUCORPI = 0.887). There was no statistically significant difference among the tests for the data of patients with ongoing pregnancies.
Conclusions:
In this study, which is the first study comparing the five most frequently used ovarian responsiveness markers and the second study signifying the role of OSI in an antagonist protocol, OSI was found to be more convenient to calculate, and it could be superior to other ovarian responsiveness markers for poor and high ovarian responses on cycles with agonist or antagonist protocols.
More Related Videos
11:29Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Reproductive Cloning
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
In SCNT, an egg cell is taken from an animal and its nucleus is removed, creating an enucleated egg. Then a somatic...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Asexual Reproduction
Overview of the Reproductive System
The gonads, or primary reproductive organs, produce gametes and sex hormones. In males, the testes produce spermatozoa and testosterone, which is responsible for developing secondary male sex characteristics, including a deeper voice, larger muscles, facial and body...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison