Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles
Published on: November 1, 2012
Martin Vigorimeter assesses muscle fatigability in older adults better than the Jamar Dynamometer
Liza De Dobbeleer1, Olga Theou2, Ingo Beyer1
1Gerontology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium; Frailty in Ageing Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium; Geriatrics Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Introduction:
Muscle fatigability can be measured based on sustained handgrip performance, but different grip strength devices exist and their relationship to frailty remains unclear. We aimed to compare muscle fatigability obtained by Martin Vigorimeter and Jamar Dynamometer in older women across levels of frailty.
Method:
53 community-dwelling women living in Greece (63-100 y), categorized according to tertiles on the Frailty Index score (FI) as: low-frail (FI < 0.19), intermediate-frail (FI 0.19-0.36), and high-frail (FI > 0.36). Fatigue resistance (FR, time for maximal grip strength to decrease to 50% during sustained contraction) was measured with both Martin Vigorimeter and Jamar Dynamometer, and grip work (GW, reflecting the area under the time-force curve) was calculated.
Results:
FR, when measured with the Martin Vigorimeter, was approximately double in low-frail (44.3 ± 24.6 s) compared to high-frail participants (23.9 ± 12.7 s, p = 0.011), whereas FR was similar across frailty groups when measured with the Jamar Dynamometer. In logistic regression models, FR (OR = 0.94 [0.90-0.99]) and GW (OR = 0.90 [0.82-0.99]) were significantly related to high frailty when measured with the Martin Vigorimeter but not when measured with Jamar Dynamometer. There is a significantly proportional difference in FR measured with both devices (R2 = 0.364, p < 0.001), highlighting that the longer the participant could sustain the FR test, the higher the difference in FR measured with both devices.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that the Martin Vigorimeter is a more appropriate handgrip device compared with the Jamar Dynamometer to assess muscle fatigability for older women across levels of frailty. When measured with the Martin Vigorimeter, high-frail participants show twice the level of fatigability compared to low-frail, whereas no difference was observed when using the Jamar Dynamometer. Older participants might stop the FR test prematurely when using the Jamar Dynamometer, before muscle fatigue is reached, indicating that the Jamar Dynamometer is unable to identify those participants with higher levels of muscle endurance. Martin Vigorimeter assessed muscle fatigability might be a good additional marker to include in frailty tools.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Adult Stem Cells
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Fibers
Slow-Twitch Muscle Fibers
Slow oxidative, muscle fibers appear red due to large numbers of capillaries and high levels of...
Muscles of the Eye
Extraocular Muscles
The six extraocular muscles surround the eyeball and control its movements. They are responsible for a wide range of eye motions, including looking up, down, left, right, and...
Muscles that Move the Head
The bilateral sternocleidomastoid, or SCM, and the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles are significant head flexors. The SCM muscles originate at the sternum and clavicle and attach to the mastoid process of the temporal bone. The SCM contracts bilaterally to bend the head forward, whereas...
Muscles of the Abdomen
Anterolateral Region
The anterolateral region comprises five paired muscles classified into the lateral and...

