Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Automation of a Positron-emission Tomography PET Radiotracer Synthesis Protocol for Clinical Production
Published on: October 26, 2018
Is Perfusion MRI without Deconvolution Reliable for Mismatch Detection in Acute Stroke? Validation with 15O-Positron
Johanna Reimer1,2, Cornelia Montag1, Alexander Schuster1
1Max-Planck-Institute for Neurological Research, Cologne, Germany.
Background:
In acute stroke, the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based mismatch concept is used to select patients with tissue at risk of infarction for reperfusion therapies. There is however a controversy if non-deconvolved or deconvolved perfusion weighted (PW) parameter maps perform better in tissue at risk prediction and which parameters and thresholds should be used to guide treatment decisions.
Methods:
In a group of 22 acute stroke patients with consecutive MR and quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, non-deconvolved parameters were validated with the gold standard for penumbral-flow (PF) detection 15O-water PET. Performance of PW parameters was assessed by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify the accuracy of each PWI map to detect the -upper PF threshold as defined by PET cerebral blood flow <20 mL/100 g/min.
Results:
Among normalized non-deconvolved parameters, PW-first moment without delay correction (FM without DC) > 3.6 s (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.89, interquartile range [IQR] 0.85-0.94), PW-maximum of the concentration curve (Cmax) < 0.66 (AUC = 0.92, IQR 0.84-0.96) and PW-time to peak (TTP) > 4.0 s (AUC = 0.92, IQR 0.87-0.94) perform significantly better than other non-deconvolved parameters to detect the PF threshold as defined by PET.
Conclusions:
Non-deconvolved parameters FM without DC, Cmax and TTP are an observer-independent alternative to established deconvolved parameters (e.g., Tmax) to guide treatment decisions in acute stroke.
Insights
Non-deconvolved perfusion imaging parameters, including FM without DC, Cmax, and TTP, accurately predict tissue at risk in acute stroke patients. These metrics offer a reliable, observer-independent alternative for guiding reperfusion therapy decisions.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Radiology
- Stroke Medicine
Background:
- The mismatch concept in MR imaging is crucial for selecting acute stroke patients for reperfusion therapy.
- A controversy exists regarding the efficacy of deconvolved versus non-deconvolved perfusion-weighted (PW) parameter maps for predicting at-risk tissue.
- Optimal parameters and thresholds for guiding acute stroke treatment decisions remain debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate non-deconvolved perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) parameters against quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting penumbral flow (PF) in acute stroke.
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of various non-deconvolved PWI parameters in identifying tissue at risk of infarction.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 22 acute stroke patients underwent both MR and quantitative 15O-water PET imaging.
- Non-deconvolved PWI parameters were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
- The gold standard for PF detection was defined by PET-derived cerebral blood flow <20 mL/100 g/min.
Main Results:
- Normalized non-deconvolved parameters demonstrated significant accuracy in detecting the PF threshold.
- PW-first moment without delay correction (FM without DC) > 3.6 s (AUC = 0.89) showed high predictive value.
- PW-maximum of the concentration curve (Cmax) < 0.66 (AUC = 0.92) and PW-time to peak (TTP) > 4.0 s (AUC = 0.92) were highly accurate in identifying at-risk tissue.
Conclusions:
- Non-deconvolved PWI parameters, specifically FM without DC, Cmax, and TTP, are effective in predicting tissue at risk in acute stroke.
- These parameters provide observer-independent alternatives to established deconvolved parameters like Tmax.
- The findings support the use of these non-deconvolved parameters for guiding acute stroke treatment decisions.
More Related Videos
09:5718F-Labeling of Radiotracers Functionalized with a Silicon Fluoride Acceptor SiFA for Positron Emission Tomography
Published on: January 11, 2020
10:21Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
Published on: August 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Reliability and Validity
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Mismatch Repair
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Deconvolution
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...