Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Chinese Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Administered to High-Risk
Hui Wang1, Haifeng Li1, Jiangping Wang1
1The Pediatric Rehabilitation Department, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Insights
The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) demonstrates good reliability and validity for screening motor delays in high-risk Chinese infants. This tool is effective for assessing infant motor development in China.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Motor Development Assessment
Background:
- The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is a widely used tool for screening motor development delays in high-risk infants.
- Its reliability and validity in the Chinese population have not been previously established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and concurrent validity of the AIMS in high-risk infants aged 0-9 months in China.
- To determine if AIMS is a suitable screening tool for this demographic.
Main Methods:
- A single-center study involving 50 high-risk infants (0-9 months) in China.
- Infant evaluations using AIMS were video-recorded for interrater and intrarater reliability assessments.
- Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing AIMS scores with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 (PDMS-2).
Main Results:
- High intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated excellent intrarater (0.811-0.995) and interrater (0.982-0.997) reliability for AIMS.
- AIMS total scores showed strong correlations with all PDMS-2 subtests (ICC=0.751-0.977).
- Moderate correlations were observed between AIMS and PDMS-2 motor quotients (kappa=0.580-0.724).
Conclusions:
- The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) exhibits acceptable reliability and concurrent validity for screening motor developmental delays in high-risk infants in China.
- AIMS is a viable and effective tool for pediatric motor development assessment in this population.
Abstract:
The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is widely used to screen for delays in motor development in high-risk infants, but its reliability and validity in Chinese infants have not been investigated. To examine the reliability and concurrent validity of AIMS in high-risk infants aged 0-9 months in China, this single-center study enrolled 50 high-risk infants aged 0-9 months (range, 0.17-9.27; average, 4.14±2.02), who were divided into two groups: 0-3 months (n=23) and 4-9 months (n=27). A physical therapist evaluated the infants with AIMS, with each evaluation video-recorded. To examine interrater reliability, two other evaluators calculated AIMS scores by observing the videos. To measure intrarater reliability, the two evaluators rescored AIMS after >1 month, using the videos. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing results between AIMS and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 (PDMS-2). For all age groups analyzed (0-3, 4-9, and 0-9 months), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for AIMS total score were high for both intrarater comparisons (0.811-0.995) and interrater comparisons (0.982-0.997). AIMS total scores were well correlated with all PDMS-2 subtest scores (ICC=0.751-0.977 for reflexes, stationary, locomotion, grasping, and visual-motor integration subsets). However, the fifth percentile of AIMS total score was only moderately correlated with the gross motor quotient, fine motor quotient, and total motor quotient subtests of PDMS-2 (kappa=0.580, 0.601, and 0.724, respectively). AIMS has acceptable reliability and concurrent validity for screening of motor developmental delay in high-risk infants in China.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
pH Scale
Relative Risk
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Administering Oxygen by Mask
Administering oxygen by mask is a common nursing intervention that provides supplemental oxygen to patients with respiratory distress or chronic lung conditions. This procedure involves delivering oxygen at a specified rate through a face mask connected to an oxygen source.
Equipment
The equipment necessary for this procedure includes:

