Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Studying Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling by Aortic Debanding in Rodents
Published on: July 14, 2021
Cardiac resynchronization is pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse ventricular remodelling: a systematic review
Bishoy Deif1, Brennan Ballantyne1, Fahad Almehmadi1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Western University, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) responders show reduced ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) compared to non-responders. CRT non-responders may have an increased risk of VAs, suggesting a potential pro-arrhythmic effect without reverse remodeling.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and heart failure hospitalizations.
- The impact of CRT on ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is debated, with some evidence suggesting a neutral effect.
- A hypothesis exists that CRT with left ventricular (LV) epicardial stimulation may be pro-arrhythmic in non-responders but anti-arrhythmic in responders.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the rate of VAs in patients undergoing CRT.
- To compare VA rates between CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) non-responders, CRT-D responders, and patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) only.
- To investigate the potential pro-arrhythmic or anti-arrhythmic effects of CRT based on patient response.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective cohort, prospective cohort, and randomized controlled trials.
- Studies compared VA rates between CRT-D non-responders, CRT-D responders, and ICD-only patients.
- CRT-D responders were defined by discrete LV volumetric values assessed by imaging.
Main Results:
- 23 full-text articles were analyzed from 2579 initial citations.
- CRT-D responders had significantly lower VA rates than CRT-D non-responders (RR 0.49) and ICD-only patients (RR 0.59).
- CRT-D mechanical non-responders had a higher likelihood of VAs compared to ICD-only patients (RR 0.76).
Conclusions:
- CRT-D non-responders exhibit higher VA rates than CRT-D responders and ICD-only patients.
- These findings suggest that CRT with LV epicardial stimulation might be pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse ventricular remodeling.
- CRT appears to confer an anti-arrhythmic benefit in mechanical responders.
Aims:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization but its effects on the rate of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) appears to be neutral. We hypothesize that CRT with LV epicardial stimulation is inherently pro-arrhythmic and increases VA rates in the absence of reverse ventricular remodelling while conferring an anti-arrhythmic effect in mechanical responders.
Methods And Results:
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we considered retrospective cohort, prospective cohort, and randomized controlled trials comparing VA rates between cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) non-responders, CRT-D responders and those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) only. Studies were eligible if they defined CRT-D responders using a discrete left ventricular volumetric value as assessed by any imaging modality. Studies were identified through searching electronic databases from their inception to July 2017. We identified 2579 citations, of which 23 full-text articles were eligible for final analysis. Our results demonstrated that CRT-D responders were less likely to experience VA than CRT-D non-responders, relative risk (RR) 0.49 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.58, P < 0.01] and also less than patients with ICD only: RR 0.59 (95% CI 0.50-0.69, P < 0.01). However, CRT-D mechanical non-responders had a greater likelihood of VA compared with ICD only, RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.92, P = 0.004).
Conclusion:
CRT-D non-responders experienced more VA than CRT-D responders and also more than those with ICD only, suggesting that CRT with LV epicardial stimulation may be inherently pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse remodelling.
More Related Videos
04:34Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Nucleosome Remodeling
Nucleosome remodeling complex
Eukaryotic cells have specialized enzymes called ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling enzymes. These enzymes...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Bone Remodeling
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups