Measures of adiposity differentially correlate with C-reactive protein among persons with multiple sclerosis

Tracy Baynard1, Thessa I M Hilgenkamp2, Elizabeth C Schroeder1

  • 1Integrative Physiology Laboratory and the Department of Kinesiology & Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St., MC-517, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.

Abstract

Insights

In individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), whole body fat percentage is linked to systemic inflammation (CRP), unlike in controls. This finding highlights body fat

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Immunology
  • Metabolic disease research

Background:

  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is partly inflammatory, yet adiposity's role is understudied.
  • Adiposity links to inflammation and cardiovascular/metabolic disease risk in the general population.
  • MS patients have higher cardiovascular disease rates, necessitating research into adiposity, inflammation, and MS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate associations between adiposity measures and systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein, CRP).
  • To compare these associations in individuals with MS versus a control group without MS.

Main Methods:

  • Compared 33 individuals with MS to 33 controls.
  • Measured adiposity (BMI, total body fat, trunk fat) and C-reactive protein (CRP).
  • Correlated and regressed adiposity measures against CRP.

Main Results:

  • Differential relationships between CRP and adiposity were found between groups.
  • In MS patients, only whole body percent fat significantly predicted CRP variance (adjusted R²=0.095, p<0.05).
  • In controls, all adiposity measures predicted CRP variance (p<0.05), with trunk fat showing the strongest correlation.

Conclusions:

  • Whole body fat percentage may be a key factor in MS-related systemic inflammation, more so than BMI or trunk fat.
  • Future research on body fatness, obesity, and CRP in MS should consider these differential associations.

Related Concept Videos

Correlations02:20

Correlations

Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.4K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
42.8K
Correlation01:09

Correlation

In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
15.2K
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.2K
Cross-reactivity00:42

Cross-reactivity

Overview
33.1K
Reactivity of Enols01:18

Reactivity of Enols

Enols are a class of compounds where a hydroxyl group is attached to a carbon–carbon double bond, which implies that it is a vinyl alcohol. A carbonyl compound with an α hydrogen undergoes keto–enol tautomerism and remains in equilibrium with its tautomer, the enol form. Usually, the keto tautomer is present in a higher concentration than the enol tautomer due to the higher bond energy of C=O compared to C=C. Moreover, the direction of the keto–enol equilibrium is...
4.1K