Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chromosome Replication02:31

Chromosome Replication

10.7K
Before a cell can divide, it must accurately replicate all of its chromosomes, including the DNA and its associated histone and non-histone proteins.  This process begins at numerous origins of replication during the S phase of the cell cycle in each of a cell’s chromosomes simultaneously. Certain nucleotides can act as origins of replication, but these sequences are not well defined - especially in complex, multi-cellular, eukaryotic species. The length of DNA that spans an origin...
10.7K
DNA Replication02:40

DNA Replication

59.6K
DNA replication involves the separation of the two strands of the double helix, with each strand serving as a template from which the new complementary strand is copied.  After replication, each double-stranded DNA includes one parental or “old” strand and one “new” strand. This is known as semiconservative replication. The resulting DNA molecules have the same sequence and are divided equally into the two daughter cells.
Replication in Prokaryotes
DNA replication...
59.6K
Replication in Prokaryotes02:35

Replication in Prokaryotes

98.7K
Overview
98.7K
Replication in Prokaryotes01:32

Replication in Prokaryotes

28.0K
DNA replication has three main steps: initiation, elongation, and termination. Replication in prokaryotes begins when initiator proteins bind to the single origin of replication (ori) on the cell's circular chromosome. Replication then proceeds around the entire circle of the chromosome in each direction from the two replication forks, resulting in two DNA molecules.
Many Proteins Work Together to Replicate the Chromosome
Replication is coordinated and carried out by a host of specialized...
28.0K
Replication in Eukaryotes02:31

Replication in Eukaryotes

205.4K
Overview
205.4K
The DNA Replication Fork01:02

The DNA Replication Fork

41.1K
An organism’s genome needs to be duplicated in an efficient and error-free manner for its growth and survival. The replication fork is a Y-shaped active region where two strands of DNA are separated and replicated continuously. The coupling of DNA unzipping and complementary strand synthesis is a characteristic feature of a replication fork.   Organisms with small circular DNA, such as E. coli, often have a single origin of replication; therefore, they have only two replication...
41.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Specificity and exon target space of splicing modifying compounds.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Lignocellulose-mediated selection of potential halophilic PET-degrading enzymes from mangrove soil.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Metagenomic, metabolomic, and sensorial characteristics of fermented <i>Coffea arabica</i> L. var. Castillo beans inoculated with microbial starter cultures.

mSystems·2025
Same author

A Latin American perspective on microbiome research.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Virus species names have been standardized; virus names remain unchanged.

mSphere·2025
Same author

The transcription factor ZNF469 regulates collagen production in liver fibrosis.

JCI insight·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Creating Anatomically Accurate and Reproducible Intracranial Xenografts of Human Brain Tumors
11:14

Creating Anatomically Accurate and Reproducible Intracranial Xenografts of Human Brain Tumors

Published on: September 24, 2014

16.2K

Reproducible and replicable comparisons using SummarizedBenchmark.

Patrick K Kimes1,2, Alejandro Reyes1,2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|July 18, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces SummarizedBenchmark, an R package that standardizes biological tool comparisons. It enhances reproducibility and consistency in benchmark studies for biological questions.

More Related Videos

Chromosome Replicating Timing Combined with Fluorescent In situ Hybridization
17:14

Chromosome Replicating Timing Combined with Fluorescent In situ Hybridization

Published on: December 10, 2012

14.6K
A Protocol for Analyzing Hepatitis C Virus Replication
13:04

A Protocol for Analyzing Hepatitis C Virus Replication

Published on: June 26, 2014

24.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Creating Anatomically Accurate and Reproducible Intracranial Xenografts of Human Brain Tumors
11:14

Creating Anatomically Accurate and Reproducible Intracranial Xenografts of Human Brain Tumors

Published on: September 24, 2014

16.2K
Chromosome Replicating Timing Combined with Fluorescent In situ Hybridization
17:14

Chromosome Replicating Timing Combined with Fluorescent In situ Hybridization

Published on: December 10, 2012

14.6K
A Protocol for Analyzing Hepatitis C Virus Replication
13:04

A Protocol for Analyzing Hepatitis C Virus Replication

Published on: June 26, 2014

24.7K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Benchmark studies are crucial for evaluating biological tools but often lack standardization.
  • Inconsistent implementation of benchmarks hinders reproducibility and comparability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce SummarizedBenchmark, an R package and framework for organizing biological benchmark comparisons.
  • To provide a standardized approach for setting up and executing benchmark studies.
  • To improve the reproducibility and replicability of biological tool evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Development of SummarizedBenchmark, an R package available via Bioconductor.
  • Implementation of a general grammar for structuring benchmark comparisons.
  • Demonstration of framework applicability across diverse biological applications.

Main Results:

  • SummarizedBenchmark offers a consistent framework for biological benchmarking.
  • The package facilitates easier setup and execution of comparative analyses.
  • The framework demonstrably improves reproducibility and replicability.

Conclusions:

  • SummarizedBenchmark provides a standardized and robust solution for biological tool benchmarking.
  • The framework's design promotes consistent and reliable evaluation of computational tools.
  • This approach is applicable across various biological research domains.